Amitriptyline vs divalproate in migraine prophylaxis: a randomized controlled trial

Objective This study compares efficacy and safety of divalproate extended release (DVA‐ER) and amitriptyline (AMT) in migraine. Materials and methods Three hundred migraineurs having >4 attacks monthly were randomized into DVA‐ER or AMT. The primary end points were >50% reduction in frequency,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta neurologica Scandinavica Vol. 128; no. 1; pp. 65 - 72
Main Authors: Kalita, J., Bhoi, S. K., Misra, U. K.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Denmark Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-07-2013
Hindawi Limited
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective This study compares efficacy and safety of divalproate extended release (DVA‐ER) and amitriptyline (AMT) in migraine. Materials and methods Three hundred migraineurs having >4 attacks monthly were randomized into DVA‐ER or AMT. The primary end points were >50% reduction in frequency, ≥1 grade improvement in the severity, and >50% improvement in a visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary end points were functional disability, rescue medication, and adverse events. Results The median age was 32 years, and 241 were women. 150 patients each received DVA‐ER and AMT. At 3 months, 74.7% in DVA‐ER and 62% patients in AMT group improved in headache frequency (P = 0.02) and at 6 months, 65.3% and 54%, respectively (P = 0.90). At 3 months, the VAS score improved by >50% in 80.7% in DVA‐ER and 64% in AMT (P = 0.005). At 6 months, there was no significant difference between the two groups in VAS score (69.3% vs 56%; P = 0.47) and other outcome parameters. The composite side effects were also not different between the two groups (68% vs 81%); however, hair fall, menstrual irregularity, polycystic ovary, and weight gain were commoner in DVA‐ER group. Conclusion Divalproate extended release is more effective at 3 months than AMT; however, at 6 months, both are equally effective in migraine prophylaxis.
Bibliography:ArticleID:ANE12081
istex:66D25EB90F708193F1EA6C996CC79FF7CB42D1AB
ark:/67375/WNG-VLPN641C-V
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0001-6314
1600-0404
DOI:10.1111/ane.12081