Dyadic Flexibility during the Face-to-Face Still-Face Paradigm: A dynamic systems analysis of its temporal organization

•We modeled the Face-to-Face Still-Face paradigm using dynamic systems principles.•A measure of dyadic flexibility was derived using the state space grid technique.•Infant–caregiver dyadic flexibility, though stable, increased after a perturbation.•Dyadic flexibility was correlated to infant negativ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Infant behavior & development Vol. 36; no. 3; pp. 432 - 437
Main Authors: Sravish, Akhila V., Tronick, Edward, Hollenstein, Tom, Beeghly, Marjorie
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Amsterdam Elsevier Inc 01-06-2013
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•We modeled the Face-to-Face Still-Face paradigm using dynamic systems principles.•A measure of dyadic flexibility was derived using the state space grid technique.•Infant–caregiver dyadic flexibility, though stable, increased after a perturbation.•Dyadic flexibility was correlated to infant negativity during the perturbation.•Sons of depressed mothers appeared to have greater regulatory difficulties. A dynamic systems analytical model was used to characterize infant–caregiver regulatory dynamics. Though stable, there was an increase in dyadic flexibility following a perturbation. Dyadic flexibility was positively related to infant negativity during the perturbation. Findings were qualified by infant sex and maternal depressive symptoms.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0163-6383
1879-0453
1934-8800
DOI:10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.03.013