Dyadic Flexibility during the Face-to-Face Still-Face Paradigm: A dynamic systems analysis of its temporal organization
•We modeled the Face-to-Face Still-Face paradigm using dynamic systems principles.•A measure of dyadic flexibility was derived using the state space grid technique.•Infant–caregiver dyadic flexibility, though stable, increased after a perturbation.•Dyadic flexibility was correlated to infant negativ...
Saved in:
Published in: | Infant behavior & development Vol. 36; no. 3; pp. 432 - 437 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Amsterdam
Elsevier Inc
01-06-2013
Elsevier |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •We modeled the Face-to-Face Still-Face paradigm using dynamic systems principles.•A measure of dyadic flexibility was derived using the state space grid technique.•Infant–caregiver dyadic flexibility, though stable, increased after a perturbation.•Dyadic flexibility was correlated to infant negativity during the perturbation.•Sons of depressed mothers appeared to have greater regulatory difficulties.
A dynamic systems analytical model was used to characterize infant–caregiver regulatory dynamics. Though stable, there was an increase in dyadic flexibility following a perturbation. Dyadic flexibility was positively related to infant negativity during the perturbation. Findings were qualified by infant sex and maternal depressive symptoms. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0163-6383 1879-0453 1934-8800 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.03.013 |