Inter- and intra-breed comparative study of sperm motility and viability in Iberian and Duroc boar semen during long-term storage in MR-A and XCell extenders

• Published in: Animal reproduction science Vol. 139; no. 1-4; pp. 109 - 114
• Main Authors: Martín-Hidalgo, D, Barón, F.J, Robina, A, Bragado, M.J, Llera, A. Hurtado de, García-Marín, L.J, Gil, M.C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01-06-2013
• Subjects: Animals; Boar; boars; Breed; CASA; Duroc; flow cytometry; Flow Cytometry - veterinary; Indexing in process; Male; MR-A; semen; Semen Analysis - veterinary; Semen Preservation - methods; Semen Preservation - veterinary; sperm motility; Spermatozoa - physiology; Statistics, Nonparametric; Storage; storage time; Swine - physiology; viability; XCell; Boar; XCell; CASA; Breed; Storage; MR-A
• ISSN: 0378-4320; 1873-2232
• DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.04.001

During boar semen liquid preservation, extender is one of the factors that influence storage tolerance of spermatozoa. However, there are few studies about intra-breed variation in the preservation of semen quality during storage in different extenders. Similarly, boar breed is generally not considered a possible factor influencing variation in the semen storage tolerance in a particular extender. The aim of this study was to compare boar semen storage potential, in terms of the ability to maintain sperm viability and motility, of two currently used long-term extenders, MR-A and XCell. Extended semen from two breeds, Iberian and Duroc that had been stored at 17°C for up to 7 days was used. Intra- and inter-breed effect was studied. On Days 1, 4 and 7 (Day 0=day of semen collection), motility parameters and the percentage of total motile sperm and progressively motile sperm using a CASA system was evaluated. Viability (SYBR-14/PI) was evaluated by flow cytometry. Within each breed and for each storage day, there were differences between extenders, although semen tolerance to preservation was more influenced by the extender in the Iberian than in the Duroc breed. Neither breed nor extender influenced the percentage of viable spermatozoa during the storage time. Moreover, differences in motility parameters were observed between breeds, although the differences were greater when the XCell extender was used. In conclusion, both extender and breed influence motility characteristics of liquid-stored boar semen, so both aspects have to be considered in the design of comparative studies about stored boar semen quality from different breeds or with different extenders. Further studies are needed to corroborate these findings.