Forest–atmosphere carbon dioxide exchange in eastern Siberia

We investigated the daily exchange of CO 2 between undisturbed Larix gmelinii (Rupr.) Rupr. forest and the atmosphere at a remote Siberian site during July and August of 1993. Our goal was to measure and partition total CO 2 exchanges into aboveground and belowground components by measuring forest a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agricultural and forest meteorology Vol. 90; no. 4; pp. 291 - 306
Main Authors: Hollinger, D.Y., Kelliher, F.M., Schulze, E.-D., Bauer, G., Arneth, A., Byers, J.N., Hunt, J.E., McSeveny, T.M., Kobak, K.I., Milukova, I., Sogatchev, A., Tatarinov, F., Varlargin, A., Ziegler, W., Vygodskaya, N.N.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier B.V 30-04-1998
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We investigated the daily exchange of CO 2 between undisturbed Larix gmelinii (Rupr.) Rupr. forest and the atmosphere at a remote Siberian site during July and August of 1993. Our goal was to measure and partition total CO 2 exchanges into aboveground and belowground components by measuring forest and understory eddy and storage fluxes and then to determine the relationships between the environmental factors and these observations of ecosystem metabolism. Maximum net CO 2 uptake of the forest ecosystem was extremely low compared to the forests elsewhere, reaching a peak of only ∼5 μmol m −2 s −1 late in the morning. Net ecosystem CO 2 uptake increased with increasing photosynthetically active photon flux density (PPFD) and decreased as the atmospheric water vapor saturation deficit ( D) increased. Daytime ecosystem CO 2 uptake increased immediately after rain and declined sharply after about six days of drought. Ecosystem respiration at night averaged ∼2.4 μmol m −2 s −1 with about 40% of this coming from the forest floor (roots and heterotrophs). The relationship between the understory eddy flux and soil temperature at 5 cm followed an Arrhenius model, increasing exponentially with temperature (Q 10∼2.3) so that on hot summer afternoons the ecosystem became a source of CO 2. Tree canopy CO 2 exchange was calculated as the difference between above and below canopy eddy flux. Canopy uptake saturated at ∼6 μmol CO 2 m −2 s −1 for a PPFD above 500 μmol m −2 s −1 and decreased with increasing D. The optimal stomatal control model of Mäkelä et al. (1996) was used as a `big leaf' canopy model with parameter values determined by the non-linear least squares. The model accurately simulated the response of the forest to light, saturation deficit and drought. The precision of the model was such that the daily pattern of residuals between modeled and measured forest exchange reproduced the component storage flux. The model and independent leaf-level measurements suggest that the marginal water cost of plant C gain in Larix gmelinii is more similar to values from deciduous or desert species than other boreal forests. During the middle of the summer, the L. gmelinii forest ecosystem is generally a net sink for CO 2, storing ∼0.75 g C m −2 d −1.
Bibliography:F61
P40
1998003439
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0168-1923
1873-2240
DOI:10.1016/S0168-1923(98)00057-4