Saturated flow boiling of water in a narrow channel: time-averaged heat transfer coefficients and correlations

• Published in: Applied thermal engineering Vol. 24; no. 8; pp. 1207 - 1223
• Main Authors: Wen, D.S., Yan, Youyou, Kenning, D.B.R.
• Format: Journal Article Conference Proceeding
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01-06-2004; Elsevier
• Subjects: Applied sciences; Energy; Energy. Thermal use of fuels; Exact sciences and technology; Flow boiling; Heat transfer; Heat transfer coefficient; Narrow channel; Theoretical studies. Data and constants. Metering; Heat transfer coefficient; Flow boiling; Narrow channel; Thermodynamics; Subcooling; Nucleation; Rectangular cross section; Nucleate boiling; Evaporation; Vertical channel; Rectangular channel; Pressure; Thin film; Transients
• ISSN: 1359-4311
• DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2003.12.025

Time-averaged local heat transfer coefficients were measured during flow boiling of water at atmospheric pressure in a vertical channel of rectangular cross-section 2 mm by 1 mm for ranges of mass flux 57–211 kg/m
2
s, heat flux 27–160 kW/m
2, thermodynamic quality 0–0.3 and inlet subcooling 1–12 K. The heat transfer coefficients were found to increase nearly with the square root of the heat flux. There was little effect of mass flux at 107, 134 and 211 kg/m
2
s; lower heat transfer coefficients at 57 kg/m
2
s were probably due to transient local dryout. Local time-averaged quality and different inlet conditions of subcooling and compressibility had little effect.
Conventionally, this behaviour would be interpreted as nucleate boiling and a dimensional expression
h=162
q
0.44 correlated the data to ±20%. However, the heat transfer coefficients were considerably higher than would be expected for pool nucleate boiling and visual observation showed local time-sharing between nucleate boiling and thin-film evaporation without nucleation, with only small temporal changes in the heat transfer coefficient. Eleven correlations for conventional and narrow-channel boiling predicted the data poorly, ranging from 250% average over-prediction to 70% average under-prediction. This suggests that conventional methods of distinguishing between nucleate and convective boiling mechanisms are unreliable and that a better understanding of the mechanisms of boiling in narrow channels is necessary to guide the development of correlations.