Comparison of the crystalline quality of homoepitaxially grown CVD diamond layer on cleaved and polished substrates
A transmission electron microscopy (TEM) study, comparing homoepitaxial diamond layers grown on different substrate surface preparation states and crystallographic orientation is presented. Quality of epilayers grown on {111} cleaved surface and on {001} polished one is evaluated in terms of crystal...
Saved in:
Published in: | Physica status solidi. A, Applications and materials science Vol. 207; no. 9; pp. 2023 - 2028 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Berlin
WILEY-VCH Verlag
01-09-2010
WILEY‐VCH Verlag Wiley-VCH Wiley |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | A transmission electron microscopy (TEM) study, comparing homoepitaxial diamond layers grown on different substrate surface preparation states and crystallographic orientation is presented. Quality of epilayers grown on {111} cleaved surface and on {001} polished one is evaluated in terms of crystalline defects. Focused ion beam (FIB‐dual beam) sample preparations are observed by TEM using the {111}, {400} and {022} reflections of the [011] pole. Burgers vector analysis allowed to conclude the presence of 60° dislocations oriented along all the different 〈110〉 directions in the cleaved sample, while no dislocations are observed on the polished one. A complete dislocation analysis is performed for that sample. The presence of dislocations in an undoped (i.e. fully lattice matched) epilayer is surprising; and is probably induced by atomic steps, generated by the cleavage process. This notes down the importance of the substrate if high quality diamond epilayers want to be grown. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-BLZS6P57-D ArticleID:PSSA201000141 istex:265DCE5CC131B6AB52781644E18238A33E58097B |
ISSN: | 1862-6300 1862-6319 |
DOI: | 10.1002/pssa.201000141 |