Small Vestibular Schwannomas: Does Surgery Remain a Viable Treatment Option?

• Published in: Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base Vol. 77; no. 3; pp. 212 - 218
• Main Authors: Anaizi, Amjad N, DiNapoli, Vincent V, Pensak, Myles, Theodosopoulos, Philip V
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Germany Georg Thieme Verlag KG 01-06-2016
• Subjects: acoustic neuroma; hearing preservation; dizziness; outcomes; vestibular dysfunction; disequilibrium; quality of life; facial nerve function
• ISSN: 2193-6331; 2193-634X
• DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1564591

Background Surgery for small vestibular schwannomas (Koos grade I and II) has been increasingly rejected as the optimal primary treatment, instead favoring radiosurgery and observation that offer lower morbidity and potentially equal efficacy. Our study assesses the outcomes of contemporary surgical strategies including tumor control, functional preservation, and implications of pathologic findings. Design Retrospective review. Setting/Participants Eighty consecutive patients (45 women, 35 men; mean: 47 years of age). Main Outcomes Measures Approaches included retrosigmoid approach (52%), translabyrinthine (40%), and middle fossa (8%). Operated on by the same surgical team, we analyzed presentation, radiographic imaging, surgical data, and outcomes. Results At last follow-up (mean: 34 months), 95% had good facial nerve function (House-Brackmann grade I or II); 36% who presented with serviceable hearing retained it; and 93% who presented with vestibular dysfunction reported resolution. Pathology identified two grade I meningiomas. Conclusions As one of the largest contemporary surgical series of small vestibular schwannomas, we discuss some nuances to help refine treatment algorithms. Although observation and radiosurgery have established roles, our results reinforce microsurgery as a viable, safe option for a subgroup of patients.