Efficacy of pulsed estrogen therapy in relatively younger patients with surgically induced menopause
BACKGROUND: Pulsed estrogen therapy is a new approach in estrogen replacement therapy. We carried out a prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of pulsed estrogen therapy in relatively younger patients with surgically induced menopause. METHODS: Patients (n = 138) <45 years old and suffering f...
Saved in:
Published in: | Human reproduction (Oxford) Vol. 19; no. 1; pp. 210 - 213 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford
Oxford University Press
01-01-2004
Oxford Publishing Limited (England) |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | BACKGROUND: Pulsed estrogen therapy is a new approach in estrogen replacement therapy. We carried out a prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of pulsed estrogen therapy in relatively younger patients with surgically induced menopause. METHODS: Patients (n = 138) <45 years old and suffering from severe vasomotor symptoms secondary to surgically induced menopause were included in the study. After the initiation of pulsed estrogen therapy (300 µg/day), the patients were re‐evaluated every 4 weeks. The dose was increased at each follow‐up, if necessary (to a maximum of 600 µg/day). The patients who preferred another method after the first 12 weeks were prescribed oral conjugated estrogen (0.625 mg/day) and at the end of the second 12 weeks their satisfaction levels were assessed. RESULTS: At the end of the first 12 weeks, 26 patients were completely satisfied (18.8%) and 47 were moderately satisfied (34.1%), whereas 65 concluded that the pulsed estrogen therapy they received was ineffective (47.1%). At the end of the second 12 weeks, all the patients were completely satisfied. CONCLUSION: Pulsed estrogen therapy for 12 weeks reduced the frequency of hot flushes in relatively younger patients with surgically induced menopause; however, 81.2% of patients were not completely satisfied at the end of this period. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | 4To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Hosdere cad. Örgü sok. As apt. 2/15, Ayranci, Ankara, Turkey. e‐mail: Narter@turk.net local:deh011 istex:9CA477777784420C7812A385F90C68B40FD07FC9 ark:/67375/HXZ-WQT8RB4V-9 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0268-1161 1460-2350 1460-2350 |
DOI: | 10.1093/humrep/deh011 |