Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and Long-Term Mortality and Amputation Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Peripheral Vascular Interventions

Lack of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) may increase mortality and amputation risk. The authors sought to study the association between GDMT and mortality/amputation and to examine GDMT variability among providers and health s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:JACC. Cardiovascular interventions Vol. 16; no. 3; pp. 332 - 343
Main Authors: Smolderen, Kim G., Romain, Gaëlle, Provance, Jeremy B., Scierka, Lindsey E., Mao, Jialin, Goodney, Phillip P., Henke, Peter K., Sedrakyan, Art, Mena-Hurtado, Carlos
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Inc 13-02-2023
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Lack of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) may increase mortality and amputation risk. The authors sought to study the association between GDMT and mortality/amputation and to examine GDMT variability among providers and health systems. We performed an observational study using patients in the Vascular Quality Initiative registry undergoing PVI between 2017 and 2018. Two-year all-cause mortality and major amputation data were derived from Medicare claims data. Compliance with GDMT was defined as receiving a statin, antiplatelet therapy, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker if hypertensive. Propensity 1:1 matching was applied for GDMT vs no GDMT and survival analyses were performed to compare outcomes between groups. Of 15,891 patients undergoing PVIs, 48.8% received GDMT and 6,120 patients in each group were matched. Median follow-up was 9.6 (IQR: 4.5-16.2) months for mortality and 8.4 (IQR: 3.5-15.4) for amputation. Mean age was 72.0 ± 9.9 years. Mortality risk was higher among patients who did not receive GDMT versus those on GDMT (31.2% vs 24.5%; HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.25-1.50; P < 0.001), as well as, risk of amputation (16.0% vs 13.2%; HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.08-1.35; P < 0.001). GDMT rates across sites and providers ranging from 0% to 100%, with lower performance translating into higher risk. Almost one-half of the patients receiving PVI in this national quality registry were not on GDMT, and this was associated with increased risk of mortality and major amputation. Quality improvement efforts in vascular care should focus on GDMT in patients undergoing PVI. [Display omitted]
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Tweet/handles: @KimGsmolderen; @CarlosMenaYale; @YaleVAMOS; In the national Vascular Quality Initiative’s first Medicare linked PVI outcomes study, only half of the patients were on guideline directed medical therapy. No GDMT vs. GDMT was associated with a 37% and 20% increased risk of subsequent death or amputation, respectively
ISSN:1936-8798
1876-7605
DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2022.09.022