Applications of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of infection

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) in diagnosing infection in a large population of patients and in a variety of clinical circumstances where the performance of conventional imaging modalities has been questioned. We retr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nuclear medicine communications Vol. 24; no. 6; pp. 615 - 624
Main Authors: CHACKO, T K, ZHUANG, H, NAKHODA, K Z, MOUSSAVIAN, B, ALAVI, A
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hagerstown, MD Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc 01-06-2003
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) in diagnosing infection in a large population of patients and in a variety of clinical circumstances where the performance of conventional imaging modalities has been questioned. We retrospectively analysed 167 FDG PET scans obtained to evaluate 175 anatomical sites for the presence of infection. The major indications for the scans were (1) complicated orthopaedic hardware (n = 97), (2) chronic osteomyelitis (n = 56), and (3) other (n = 14six fever of unknown origin, three vascular grafts, and five soft tissue). We assessed the overall diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET for each of these indications. In addition, we further analysed this modalityʼs effectiveness by grouping the scans into specific clinical situations. A final diagnosis was made on the basis of surgical pathology and clinical follow-up for a minimum of 6 months. The overall accuracy of FDG PET in evaluating orthopaedic hardware was 96.2% for hip prosthesis, 81% for knee prosthesis, and 100% in 15 patients with other orthopaedic devices. Among the patients in our sample suspected of having chronic osteomyelitis, the accuracy was 91.2%. FDG PET was inaccurate in three cases of fever of unknown origin and accurate in all vascular graft and soft tissue infections. In 49 patients with a clinically apparent soft-tissue infection, FDG PET was able to detect or exclude underlying osteomyelitis with an accuracy of 92.3%. Among the 23 patients who had recent orthopaedic procedures, FDG PET imaging was accurate in 87% of cases. It is concluded that FDG PET is a highly effective imaging modality in the assessment of patients with suspected infection.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0143-3636
1473-5628
DOI:10.1097/00006231-200306000-00002