Detection of periimplant fenestration and dehiscence with the use of two scan modes and the smallest voxel sizes of a cone-beam computed tomography device

• Published in: Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology Vol. 115; no. 1; pp. 121 - 127
• Main Authors: de-Azevedo-Vaz, Sergio Lins, DDS, MS, Vasconcelos, Karla de Faria, DDS, MS, Neves, Frederico Sampaio, DDS, MS, Melo, Saulo Leonardo Sousa, DDS, MS, Campos, Paulo Sérgio Flores, DDS, MS, PhD, Haiter-Neto, Francisco, DDS, MS, PhD
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 2013
• Subjects: Analysis of Variance; Animals; Cattle; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Dental Implants; Dentistry; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; Predictive Value of Tests; Ribs - diagnostic imaging; Ribs - surgery; ROC Curve; Sensitivity and Specificity; Surgery; Surgical Wound Dehiscence - diagnostic imaging; Titanium
• ISSN: 2212-4403; 2212-4411
• DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.10.003

Objective To assess the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in periimplant fenestration and dehiscence detection, and to determine the effects of 2 voxel sizes and scan modes. Study Design One hundred titanium implants were placed in bovine ribs in which periimplant fenestration and dehiscence were simulated. CBCT images were acquired with the use of 3 protocols of the i-CAT NG unit: A) 0.2 mm voxel size half-scan (180°); B) 0.2 mm voxel size full-scan (360°); and C) 0.12 mm voxel size full scan (360°). Receiver operating characteristic curves and diagnostic values were obtained. The Az values were compared with the use of analysis of variance. Results The Az value for dehiscence in protocol A was significantly lower than those of B or C ( P < .01). They did not statistically differ for fenestration ( P > .05). Conclusions Protocol B yielded the highest values. The voxel sizes did not affect fenestration and dehiscence detection, and for dehiscence full-scan performed better than half-scan.