The Effectiveness of Robot- vs. Virtual Reality-Based Gait Rehabilitation: A Propensity Score Matched Cohort

• Published in: Life (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 11; no. 6; p. 548
• Main Authors: Biffi, Emilia, Beretta, Elena, Storm, Fabio Alexander, Corbetta, Claudio, Strazzer, Sandra, Pedrocchi, Alessandra, Ambrosini, Emilia
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 11-06-2021; MDPI
• Subjects: acquired brain injury; Adolescents; Bone surgery; Brain injury; Cerebral palsy; Children; Cohort analysis; cohort study; Computer & video games; Computer applications; Electronic games; Feedback; Fitness equipment; Gait; Head injuries; Impairment; Intervention; Locomotion; Matching; Patients; Performance evaluation; propensity score matching; Rehabilitation; robot-assisted gait training; Robots; Statistical analysis; Teenagers; Three dimensional analysis; Training; Treadmills; Virtual reality; virtual reality plus treadmill training
• ISSN: 2075-1729; 2075-1729
• DOI: 10.3390/life11060548

Robot assisted gait training (RAGT) and virtual reality plus treadmill training (VRTT) are two technologies that can support locomotion rehabilitation in children and adolescents affected by acquired brain injury (ABI). The literature provides evidence of their effectiveness in this population. However, a comparison between these methods is not available. This study aims at comparing the effectiveness of RAGT and VRTT for the gait rehabilitation of children and adolescents suffering from ABI. This is a prospective cohort study with propensity score matching. Between October 2016 and September 2018, all patients undergoing an intensive gait rehabilitation treatment based on RAGT or VRTT were prospectively observed. To minimize selection bias associated with the study design, patients who underwent RAGT or VRTT were retrospectively matched for age, gender, time elapsed from injury, level of impairment, and motor impairment using propensity score in a matching ratio of 1:1. Outcome measures were Gross Motor Function Mesure-88 (GMFM-88), six-min walking test (6MWT), Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ), and three-dimensional gait analysis (GA). The FAQ and the GMFM-88 had a statistically significant increase in both groups while the 6MWT improved in the RAGT group only. GA highlighted changes at the proximal level in the RAGT group, and at the distal district in the VRTT group. Although preliminary, this work suggests that RAGT and VRTT protocols foster different motor improvements, thus recommending to couple the two therapies in the paediatric population with ABI.