Abacavir Expanded Access Program for Adult Patients Infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1
Expanded access programs (EAPs) provide medication to patients with life-threatening, treatment-refractory illnesses before regulatory approval and allow the acquisition of safety information. A 2-part, multisite EAP to evaluate abacavir, a carbocyclic nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor for...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical infectious diseases Vol. 34; no. 4; pp. 535 - 542 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Chicago, IL
The University of Chicago Press
15-02-2002
University of Chicago Press |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Expanded access programs (EAPs) provide medication to patients with life-threatening, treatment-refractory illnesses before regulatory approval and allow the acquisition of safety information. A 2-part, multisite EAP to evaluate abacavir, a carbocyclic nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor for use in combination antiretroviral therapy, was conducted. The EAP involved >13,000 adults infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) who no longer responded to commercially available treatment regimens. Part A (open-label trials) examined the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of abacavir, and part B (provision of abacavir through expanded access) assessed only the occurrence of serious adverse events. By month 2 of abacavir-containing treatment, plasma HIV-1 RNA levels decreased by ⩾0.5 log10 in 31.4% of patients, and 5.6% of the patients had HIV-1 RNA levels decrease to <400 copies/mL. Drug-related serious adverse events were reported by 7.7% of patients, the most common of which were nausea, skin rash, diarrhea, malaise or fatigue, and fever. Approximately 4.6% of patients experienced a hypersensitivity reaction that was possibly drug related. Overall, the types and incidences of adverse events reported in the abacavir EAP were similar to those reported in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials evaluating abacavir. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:70923183D99B16C228CE2C927B37ECA85ADD02C7 ark:/67375/HXZ-VS09DBHW-5 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1058-4838 1537-6591 |
DOI: | 10.1086/338638 |