Abacavir Expanded Access Program for Adult Patients Infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1

Expanded access programs (EAPs) provide medication to patients with life-threatening, treatment-refractory illnesses before regulatory approval and allow the acquisition of safety information. A 2-part, multisite EAP to evaluate abacavir, a carbocyclic nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical infectious diseases Vol. 34; no. 4; pp. 535 - 542
Main Authors: Kessler, Harold A., Johnson, Judy, Follansbee, Stephen, Sension, Michael G., Mildvan, Donna, Sepulveda, Gladys E., Bellos, Nicholaos C., Hetherington, Seth V.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Chicago, IL The University of Chicago Press 15-02-2002
University of Chicago Press
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Expanded access programs (EAPs) provide medication to patients with life-threatening, treatment-refractory illnesses before regulatory approval and allow the acquisition of safety information. A 2-part, multisite EAP to evaluate abacavir, a carbocyclic nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor for use in combination antiretroviral therapy, was conducted. The EAP involved >13,000 adults infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) who no longer responded to commercially available treatment regimens. Part A (open-label trials) examined the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of abacavir, and part B (provision of abacavir through expanded access) assessed only the occurrence of serious adverse events. By month 2 of abacavir-containing treatment, plasma HIV-1 RNA levels decreased by ⩾0.5 log10 in 31.4% of patients, and 5.6% of the patients had HIV-1 RNA levels decrease to <400 copies/mL. Drug-related serious adverse events were reported by 7.7% of patients, the most common of which were nausea, skin rash, diarrhea, malaise or fatigue, and fever. Approximately 4.6% of patients experienced a hypersensitivity reaction that was possibly drug related. Overall, the types and incidences of adverse events reported in the abacavir EAP were similar to those reported in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials evaluating abacavir.
Bibliography:istex:70923183D99B16C228CE2C927B37ECA85ADD02C7
ark:/67375/HXZ-VS09DBHW-5
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1058-4838
1537-6591
DOI:10.1086/338638