Hemispatial neglect evaluated by visual line bisection task in schizophrenic patients and their unaffected siblings

Abstract Visuospatial attentional asymmetry has been investigated by the line bisection task in patients with schizophrenia, however, those studies are in small number and the results are controversial. The present study aimed to investigate hemispatial neglect in patients with schizophrenia ( n =30...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychiatry research Vol. 200; no. 2; pp. 133 - 136
Main Authors: Ozel-Kizil, Erguvan Tugba, Baskak, Bora, Gunes, Emel, Cicek, Metehan, Atbasoglu, Esref Cem
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Kidlington Elsevier Ireland Ltd 30-12-2012
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Visuospatial attentional asymmetry has been investigated by the line bisection task in patients with schizophrenia, however, those studies are in small number and the results are controversial. The present study aimed to investigate hemispatial neglect in patients with schizophrenia ( n =30), their healthy siblings ( n =30) and healthy individuals ( n =24) by a computerized version of the line bisection task. Deviation from the midline for both hemispaces (mean bisection error—MBE) were calculated and the effects of both hand and line length were controlled. Repeated measures ANOVA yielded a significant hemispace effect for the MBE scores, but no group or group×hemispace interaction effect, i.e., all three groups were inclined to a leftward bias in the left and a rightward bias in the right hemispace. MBEs were significantly different from “zero” only for the right hemispace in siblings and for the left hemispace in controls. Negative symptoms were significantly correlated with the bisection errors in the right hemispace. The results of the present study do not support aberrant hemispheric asymmetry, but bigger bisection errors in schizophrenia.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0165-1781
1872-7123
DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.04.025