Erratum to: Exploring functional data analysis and wavelet principal component analysis on ecstasy (MDMA) wastewater data
After publication of the original article [1], it came to the authors' attention that there were errors in Fig. 3, Fig. 4 and Additional file 1: Figure S1. Fig. 3 Bootstrapping confidence intervals (CIs) resulting from functional principal component analysis (FPCA) on 1000 re-samples obtained b...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC medical research methodology Vol. 17; no. 1; p. 34 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
23-02-2017
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | After publication of the original article [1], it came to the authors' attention that there were errors in Fig. 3, Fig. 4 and Additional file 1: Figure S1. Fig. 3 Bootstrapping confidence intervals (CIs) resulting from functional principal component analysis (FPCA) on 1000 re-samples obtained by a random sample with repetition from the original data sets. Panel a - Bootstrapping CI resulting from a FPCA using Fourier basis functions and no smoothing parameter; Panel b - Bootstrapping CI resulting from a FPCA using Fourier basis functions and common-optimal smoothing parameter; Panel c - Bootstrapping CI resulting from a FPCA using Fourier basis functions and individual-optimal smoothing parameter; Panel d - Bootstrapping CI resulting from a FPCA using B-splines basis functions and no smoothing parameter; Panel e - Bootstrapping CI resulting from a FPCA using B-splines basis functions and common-optimal smoothing parameter; Panel f - Bootstrapping CI resulting from a FPCA using B-splines basis functions and individual-optimal smoothing parameter Fig. 4 Sensitivity to missing for functional principal component analysis (FPCA) results. Panel a - Functional principal components (FPCs) resulting from a FPCA using Fourier basis functions and no smoothing parameter for 5, 10, 15, 20 % of missing; Panel b - Functional principal components (FPCs) resulting from a FPCA using Fourier basis functions and common-optimal smoothing parameter for 5, 10, 15, 20 % of missing; Panel c - Functional principal components (FPCs) resulting from a FPCA using Fourier basis functions and individual-optimal smoothing parameter for 5, 10, 15, 20 % of missing; Panel d - Functional principal components (FPCs) resulting from a FPCA using B-splines basis functions and no smoothing parameter for 5, 10, 15, 20 % of missing; Panel e - Functional principal components (FPCs) resulting from a FPCA using B-splines basis functions and common-optimal smoothing parameter for 5, 10, 15, 20 % of missing; Panel f - Functional principal components (FPCs) resulting from a FPCA using B-splines basis functions and individual-optimal smoothing parameter for 5, 10, 15, 20 % of missing In each Figure, panels A, B and C are not correct (but panels D, E and F are). This error was due to a mistake in the last stages of the submission process while adjusting the Figures' size to fit the journal's requirements. This error does not impact the results, discussion and conclusions of the paper. The correct version of the affected Figures are published in this erratum. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | correction ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Correction/Retraction-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1471-2288 1471-2288 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12874-017-0311-y |