Development and structural validation of a shortened version of the Participation Scale

Purpose: To validate a shortened version of the Participation Scale (P-scale) that will be quicker to use and to describe the factor structure found in the P-scale data in various study samples. Methods: A large multi-country and multi-cultural database was compiled consisting of 5125 respondents. I...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Disability and rehabilitation Vol. 34; no. 19; pp. 1596 - 1607
Main Authors: Stevelink, S. A. M., Hoekstra, T., Nardi, S. M. T., van der Zee, C. H., Banstola, N., Premkumar, R., Nicholls, P. G., van Brakel, W. H.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Informa Healthcare 01-09-2012
Taylor & Francis
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose: To validate a shortened version of the Participation Scale (P-scale) that will be quicker to use and to describe the factor structure found in the P-scale data in various study samples. Methods: A large multi-country and multi-cultural database was compiled consisting of 5125 respondents. Item analysis, explanatory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were applied to identify items for deletion and investigate the factor structure of the P-scale. Results: The multi-country database included 11 databases from six different countries. Respondents were affected by a range of health conditions, including leprosy, HIV/AIDS, dermatological conditions and various disabilities. Of the respondents included 57% were male. The P-scale Short (PSS) contains 13 items. A two-factor structure, with factors named "work-related participation" (three items) and "general participation" (10 items), showed the best model fit (Comparative Fit Index = 0.983, Tucker Lewis Index = 0.979, Rooted Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.061). The Cronbach's alphas were very good for both the whole scale and the subscales, 0.91, 0.83 and 0.90, respectively. Correlation between the two factors was high (r = 0.75) indicating that interpreting the P-scale as measuring an overall factor "participation" is still valid. A very high correlation (r = 0.99) was found between the full P-scale and the PSS. Conclusions:The findings suggest good validity of the P-scale across a range of languages and cultures. However, field testing needs to confirm the validity of the PSS to measure the level of social participation restrictions across cultures and health conditions. Implications for Rehabilitation The Participation Scale can be used to measure restrictions in social participation. The Participation Scale showed consistent structural validity across many different cultural settings and target groups. A shorter version of the scale was developed, namely the Participation Scale Short. The Participation Scale Short needs field testing before application to test its reliability, validity, reduction in administration time and usefulness.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0963-8288
1464-5165
DOI:10.3109/09638288.2012.656793