Prevention of secondary ischemic insults after severe head injury

OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two acute-care management strategies on the frequency of jugular venous desaturation and refractory intracranial hypertension and on long-term neurologic outcome in patients with severe head injury. DESIGN:Randomized clinical trial. S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Critical care medicine Vol. 27; no. 10; pp. 2086 - 2095
Main Authors: Robertson, Claudia S, Valadka, Alex B, Hannay, H Julia, Contant, Charles F, Gopinath, Shankar P, Cormio, Manuela, Uzura, Masahiko, Grossman, Robert G
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hagerstown, MD Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc 01-10-1999
Lippincott
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two acute-care management strategies on the frequency of jugular venous desaturation and refractory intracranial hypertension and on long-term neurologic outcome in patients with severe head injury. DESIGN:Randomized clinical trial. SETTING:Level I trauma hospital. PATIENTS:One hundred eighty-nine adults admitted in coma because of severe head injury. INTERVENTIONS:Patients were assigned to either cerebral blood flow (CBF)-targeted or intracranial pressure (ICP)-targeted management protocols during randomly assigned time blocks. In the CBF-targeted protocol, cerebral perfusion pressure was kept at > 70 mm Hg and PaCO2 was kept at approximately 35 torr (4.67 kPa). In the ICP-targeted protocol, cerebral perfusion pressure was kept at >50 mm Hg and hyperventilation to a PaCO2 of 25-30 torr (3.33-4.00 kPa) was used to treat intracranial hypertension. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:The CBF-targeted protocol reduced the frequency of jugular desaturation from 50.6% to 30% (p = .006). Even when the frequency of jugular desaturation was adjusted for all confounding factors that were significant, the risk of cerebral ischemia was 2.4-fold greater with the ICP-targeted protocol. Despite the reduction in secondary ischemic insults, there was no difference in neurologic outcome. Failure to alter long-term neurologic outcome was probably attributable to two major factors. A low jugular venous oxygen saturation was treated in both groups, minimizing the injury that occurred in the ICP-targeted group. The beneficial effects of the CBF-targeted protocol may have been offset by a five-fold increase in the frequency of adult respiratory distress syndrome. CONCLUSIONS:Secondary ischemic insults caused by systemic factors after severe head injury can be prevented with a targeted management protocol. However, potential adverse effects of this management strategy may offset these beneficial effects.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0090-3493
1530-0293
DOI:10.1097/00003246-199910000-00002