Simplified dark matter models in the light of AMS-02 antiproton data

A bstract In this work we perform an analysis of the recent AMS-02 antiproton flux and the antiproton-to-proton ratio in the framework of simplified dark matter models. To predict the AMS-02 observables we adopt the propagation and injection parameters determined by the observed fluxes of nuclei. We...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of high energy physics Vol. 2017; no. 4; pp. 1 - 17
Main Author: Li, Tong
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01-04-2017
Springer Nature B.V
SpringerOpen
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A bstract In this work we perform an analysis of the recent AMS-02 antiproton flux and the antiproton-to-proton ratio in the framework of simplified dark matter models. To predict the AMS-02 observables we adopt the propagation and injection parameters determined by the observed fluxes of nuclei. We assume that the dark matter particle is a Dirac fermionic dark matter, with leptophobic pseudoscalar or axialvector mediator that couples only to Standard Model quarks and dark matter particles. We find that the AMS-02 observations are consistent with the dark matter framework within the uncertainties. The antiproton data prefer a dark matter (mediator) mass in the 700 GeV-5 TeV region for the annihilation with pseudoscalar mediator and greater than 700 GeV (200 GeV-1 TeV) for the annihilation with axialvector mediator, respectively, at about 68% confidence level. The AMS-02 data require an effective dark matter annihilation cross section in the region of 1×10 −25 −1×10 −24 (1×10 −25 −4×10 −24 ) cm 3 /sforthesimplifiedmodelwithpseudoscalar (axialvector) mediator. The constraints from the LHC and Fermi-LAT are also discussed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1029-8479
1029-8479
DOI:10.1007/JHEP04(2017)112