Triceps surae stretch and voluntary contraction alters maximal M-wave magnitude

• Published in: Journal of electromyography and kinesiology Vol. 17; no. 2; pp. 203 - 211
• Main Authors: Tucker, K.J, Türker, K.S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01-04-2007
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Ankle - physiology; Bipolar; Electromyography; Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology; Female; Humans; M-wave; Male; Monopolar; Muscle Contraction - physiology; Muscle Stretching Exercises; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; Signal cancellation; Voluntary contraction; rest; peak-to-peak; surface electromyography; plantar flexion with 40% MVC; Signal cancellation; plantar flexion rest; SEMG; motor response; PTP; M-wave; SD; Bipolar; R; Monopolar; maximum voluntary contraction; PF40; MVC; Voluntary contraction; PFR; standard deviation
• ISSN: 1050-6411; 1873-5711
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.12.006

Abstract Reliability of the motor response (M-wave) is fundamental in many reflex studies; however it has recently been shown to change during some investigations. The aim of this investigation was to determine if triceps surae stretch and voluntary contraction, or recording and analysis techniques, affect the maximal M-wave magnitude. The maximal M-wave was investigated in human gastrocnemius and soleus during different foot positions and during triceps surae contraction. Both bipolar and monopolar-recoding methods, and area and peak-to-peak (PTP) amplitude analysis methods were used. Results: Maximal M-wave magnitude changed significantly between test muscle conditions, and is largest during dorsiflexion, probably due to changes in muscle bulk and recording electrode relationship. The maximal M-wave was up to 88% smaller when recorded by bipolar electrodes compared to monopolar electrodes, which is discussed in relation to signal cancellation. Area analysis provided more significant differences in M-wave magnitude between test muscle conditions than did PTP amplitude analysis, and the maximal M-wave shape changed significantly between test muscle conditions. This study suggests that maximal M-wave magnitude can vary depending on muscle condition, it highlights the importance of using correct recording and analysis techniques, and questions the reliability of using M-wave magnitude to monitor the relationship between the nerves and stimulating electrodes.