The great enrichment: a humanistic and social scientific account

• Published in: The Scandinavian economic history review Vol. 64; no. 1; pp. 6 - 18
• Main Author: McCloskey, Deirdre Nansen
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Stockholm Routledge 02-01-2016; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: dignity; Economic growth; Economic theory; great enrichment; growth theory; humanities; Liberalism; liberty
• ISSN: 0358-5522; 1750-2837
• DOI: 10.1080/03585522.2016.1152744

The scientific problem in explaining modern economic growth is its astonishing magnitude - anywhere from a 3000% to a 10,000% increase in real income, a 'Great Enrichment.' Investment, reallocation, property rights and exploitation cannot explain it. Only the bettering of betterment can, the stunning increase in new ideas, such as the screw propeller on ships or the ball bearing in machines, the modern university for the masses and careers open to talent. Why, then, the new and trade-tested ideas? Because liberty to have a go, as the English say, and a dignity to the wigmakers and telegraph operators having the go made the mass of people bold. Equal liberty and dignity for ordinary people is called 'liberalism,' and it was new to Europe in the eighteenth century, against old hierarchies. Why the liberalism? It was not deep European superiorities, but the accidents of the Four R's of (German) Reformation, (Dutch) Revolt, (American and French) Revolution and (Scottish and Scandinavian) Reading. It could have gone the other way, leaving, say, China to have the Great Enrichment, much later. Europe, and then the world, was lucky after 1800. Now China and India have adopted liberalism (in the Chinese case only in the economy) and are catching up.