Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Energy in Older Adults: A Pilot Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the effectiveness of a transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) device typically used for pain suppression (analgesia) during pressure injury (PI) healing, peripheral vascularization, and secondary pain in older adults with chronic PIs and cognitive impairment. DESIGN A...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advances in skin & wound care Vol. 31; no. 10; pp. 462 - 469
Main Authors: García-Pérez, Sara, García-Ríos, Ma Carmen, Pérez-Mármol, José Manuel, Tapia-Haro, Rosa María, Albornoz-Cabello, Manuel, Valenza, Marie Carmen, Aguilar-Ferrándiz, María Encarnación
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved 01-10-2018
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the effectiveness of a transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) device typically used for pain suppression (analgesia) during pressure injury (PI) healing, peripheral vascularization, and secondary pain in older adults with chronic PIs and cognitive impairment. DESIGN AND SETTING:This pilot clinical trial followed patients from 6 nursing homes. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION:Twenty-two patients with PIs in the distal third of their lower limbs (7 men, 15 women) were included in this study. The control group completed standard wound care (SWC), whereas the experimental group received SWC and TENS. A total of 20 sessions were conducted for each group over 2 months, 3 times a week. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:PI area, PI healing rate, blood flow, skin temperature, oxygen saturation, and level of pain at baseline and posttreatment. MAIN RESULTS:Significant improvements were achieved in PI area (mean difference, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15–1.67; P =.024), healing rate (3; 95% CI, 1–4.99; P =.009), skin temperature (1.82; 95% CI, 0.35–3.28; P =.021), and pain (1.44; 95% CI, 0.49–2.39; P =.008) in the experimental group, whereas none of the variables revealed a significant change in the control group. CONCLUSIONS:The effect of local and spinal TENS combined with the SWC for PI produced a significant improvement in size, healing, skin temperature, and pain levels.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1527-7941
1538-8654
DOI:10.1097/01.ASW.0000544614.18501.b4