Subgingival ultrasonic instrumentation of residual pockets irrigated with essential oils: a randomized controlled trial

Feng HS, Bernardo CC, Sonoda LL, Hayashi F, Romito GA, De Lima LAPA, Lotufo RFM, Pannuti CM. Subgingival ultrasonic instrumentation of residual pockets irrigated with essential oils: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol 2011; doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2011.01725.x. Aim: To evaluate the c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical periodontology Vol. 38; no. 7; pp. 637 - 643
Main Authors: Feng, Hsu Shao, Bernardo, Carlos Cheque, Sonoda, Livia Lie, Hayashi, Fernando, Romito, Giuseppe Alexandre, De Lima, Luiz Antonio Pugliesi Alves, Lotufo, Roberto Fraga Moreira, Pannuti, Claudio Mendes
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-07-2011
Blackwell
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Feng HS, Bernardo CC, Sonoda LL, Hayashi F, Romito GA, De Lima LAPA, Lotufo RFM, Pannuti CM. Subgingival ultrasonic instrumentation of residual pockets irrigated with essential oils: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol 2011; doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2011.01725.x. Aim: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of subgingival ultrasonic instrumentation irrigated with essential oils (EOs) of residual periodontal pockets. Material and methods: Sixty‐four individuals with chronic periodontitis were invited to participate in this randomized, double‐blind, parallel, and placebo‐controlled clinical trial. All subjects received non‐surgical periodontal therapy. After re‐evaluation (baseline), residual pockets (pocket depth 5 mm) received test (ultrasonic instrumentation irrigated with EOs) or control therapy (ultrasonic instrumentation irrigated with negative control). Probing pocket depth (PPD), gingival recession (R), clinical attachment level (CAL), bleeding on probing (BOP), and plaque were assessed at baseline and after 4, 12, and 24 weeks. Differences between groups and changes over the course of time were analysed according to a generalized linear model. Results: There was a significant reduction in PPD and BOP, as well as a significant CAL gain in the two groups (p<0.001). Nevertheless, there were no differences between the groups at any time of the study. When only initially deep pockets (PPD 7 mm) were analysed, a significantly greater CAL gain (p=0.03) and PPD reduction (p=0.01) was observed in the test group. Conclusion: The adjunctive use of EOs may promote significant CAL gain and PPD reduction in deep residual pockets.
Bibliography:istex:773E928F04866EAB168BB738E9BE7B290726936C
ark:/67375/WNG-1KW365VR-S
ArticleID:JCPE1725
The authors declare they have no conflict of interests.
This study was partially supported by an unrestricted independent investigator grant from Johnson and Johnson Consumer and Personal Products Worldwide – a division of Johnson and Johnson Consumer Companies Inc., Morris Plains, NJ, USA.
Conflict of interest and source of funding statement
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
ISSN:0303-6979
1600-051X
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01725.x