The Parkland Protocol's modified Berne-Norwood criteria predict two tiers of risk for traumatic brain injury progression

• Published in: Journal of neurotrauma Vol. 31; no. 20; p. 1737
• Main Authors: Pastorek, Rachel A, Cripps, Michael W, Bernstein, Ira H, Scott, William W, Madden, Christopher J, Rickert, Kim L, Wolf, Steven E, Phelan, Herb A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 15-10-2014
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Brain Injuries - complications; Brain Injuries - diagnosis; Brain Injuries - pathology; Clinical Protocols; Disease Progression; Enoxaparin - therapeutic use; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents - therapeutic use; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Assessment; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Venous Thromboembolism - diagnosis; Venous Thromboembolism - etiology; Venous Thromboembolism - prevention & control; progression; TBI; venous thromboembolism; validation
• ISSN: 1557-9042
• DOI: 10.1089/neu.2014.3366

As a basis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after traumatic brain injury (TBI), we have previously published an algorithm known as the Parkland Protocol. Patients are classified by risk for spontaneous progression of hemorrhage with chemoprophylaxis regimens tailored to each tier. We sought to validate this schema. In our algorithm, patients with any of the following are classified "low risk" for spontaneous progression: subdural hemorrhage ≤8 mm thick; epidural hemorrhage ≤8 mm thick; contusions ≤20 mm in diameter; a single contusion per lobe; any amount of subarachnoid hemorrhage; or any amount of intraventricular hemorrhage. Patients with any injury exceeding these are "moderate risk" for progression, and any patient receiving a monitor or craniotomy is "high risk." From February 2010 to November 2012, TBI patients were entered into a dedicated database tracking injury types and sizes, risk category at presentation, and progression on subsequent computed tomgraphies (CTs). The cohort (n=414) was classified as low risk (n=200), moderate risk (n=75), or high risk (n=139) after first CT. After repeat CT scan, radiographic progression was noted in 27% of low-risk, 53% of moderate-risk, and 58% of high-risk subjects. Omnibus analysis of variance test for differences in progression rates was highly significant (p<0.0001). Tukey's post-hoc test showed the low-risk progression rate to be significantly different than both the moderate- and high-risk arms; no difference was noted between the moderate- and high-risk arms themselves. These criteria are a valid tool for classifying TBI patients into two categories of risk for spontaneous progression. This supports tailored chemoprophylaxis regimens for each arm.