Do female surgeons learn or teach differently?

Abstract Background Gender and/or gender-stereotypes might influence surgical education. We hypothesized that female surgeons might focus their learning and teaching differently from male surgeons. Methods Residents and surgeons (multi-institutional) individually recorded preoperatively discussed le...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of surgery Vol. 213; no. 2; pp. 282 - 287
Main Authors: Nebeker, Cody A, Basson, Marc D, Haan, Pam S, Davis, Alan T, Ali, Muhammad, Gupta, Rama N, Osmer, Robert L, Hardaway, John C, Peshkepija, Andi N, McLeod, Michael K, Anderson, Cheryl I
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-02-2017
Elsevier Limited
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Gender and/or gender-stereotypes might influence surgical education. We hypothesized that female surgeons might focus their learning and teaching differently from male surgeons. Methods Residents and surgeons (multi-institutional) individually recorded preoperatively discussed learning objectives (LO) for matching cases. Narratives were classified as knowledge-based, skill-based, or attitude-based. Multinomial logistic regression analyses, LO = dependent variable; independent variables = resident/surgeon gender, PGY level, timing of entry-to-procedure date, and quarters-of-year. Results 727 LOs from 125 residents (41% female) and 49 surgeons (20% female) were classified. Female residents were 1.4 times more likely to select knowledge over skill. With female surgeons, residents were 1.6 and 2.1 times more likely to select knowledge over skill and attitude over skill than if the surgeon was male. PGY 4/5 residents chose attitude-based LOs over junior residents. Conclusion Resident, surgeon gender and year-of-training influence learning objectives. Whether this reflects gender stereotyping by residents or differences in attending teaching styles awaits further exploration.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.10.010