Life cycle assessment of processes for hydrogen production. Environmental feasibility and reduction of greenhouse gases emissions
Decomposition of CH 4 (natural gas) is one of the alternatives under study to achieve the sustainable production of hydrogen. No CO 2 or other greenhouse gases emissions are produced in this route and carbon is obtained as a solid co-product at the end of the reaction ( CH 4 ⇆ C + 2 H 2 ). This proc...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of hydrogen energy Vol. 34; no. 3; pp. 1370 - 1376 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Kidlington
Elsevier Ltd
01-02-2009
Elsevier |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Decomposition of CH
4 (natural gas) is one of the alternatives under study to achieve the sustainable production of hydrogen. No CO
2 or other greenhouse gases emissions are produced in this route and carbon is obtained as a solid co-product at the end of the reaction (
CH
4
⇆
C
+
2
H
2
). This process can be thermally or catalytically conducted and recent studies have demonstrated that the carbon obtained in the reaction can also show catalytic activity.
In this work, thermal and autocatalytic decomposition of methane were studied and compared with the steam reforming with and without CO
2 capture and storage from an environmental point of view, using life cycle assessment (LCA) tools. As well, different energetic scenarios were included in the study.
The selected functional unit was 1
Nm
3 of hydrogen and the LCA was focused on material and raw materials acquisition and manufacturing stages. The assessment was carried out with SimaPro 7.1 software by using Eco-indicator 95 method. Results showed that autocatalytic decomposition is the most environmental-friendly process for hydrogen production since presented the lowest total environmental impact and CO
2 emissions. Also, steam reforming with CO
2 capture and storage led to lower CO
2 emissions but higher total environmental impact than conventional steam reforming. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0360-3199 1879-3487 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.053 |