Life cycle assessment of processes for hydrogen production. Environmental feasibility and reduction of greenhouse gases emissions

Decomposition of CH 4 (natural gas) is one of the alternatives under study to achieve the sustainable production of hydrogen. No CO 2 or other greenhouse gases emissions are produced in this route and carbon is obtained as a solid co-product at the end of the reaction ( CH 4 ⇆ C + 2 H 2 ). This proc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of hydrogen energy Vol. 34; no. 3; pp. 1370 - 1376
Main Authors: Dufour, J., Serrano, D.P., Gálvez, J.L., Moreno, J., García, C.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01-02-2009
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Decomposition of CH 4 (natural gas) is one of the alternatives under study to achieve the sustainable production of hydrogen. No CO 2 or other greenhouse gases emissions are produced in this route and carbon is obtained as a solid co-product at the end of the reaction ( CH 4 ⇆ C + 2 H 2 ). This process can be thermally or catalytically conducted and recent studies have demonstrated that the carbon obtained in the reaction can also show catalytic activity. In this work, thermal and autocatalytic decomposition of methane were studied and compared with the steam reforming with and without CO 2 capture and storage from an environmental point of view, using life cycle assessment (LCA) tools. As well, different energetic scenarios were included in the study. The selected functional unit was 1 Nm 3 of hydrogen and the LCA was focused on material and raw materials acquisition and manufacturing stages. The assessment was carried out with SimaPro 7.1 software by using Eco-indicator 95 method. Results showed that autocatalytic decomposition is the most environmental-friendly process for hydrogen production since presented the lowest total environmental impact and CO 2 emissions. Also, steam reforming with CO 2 capture and storage led to lower CO 2 emissions but higher total environmental impact than conventional steam reforming.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0360-3199
1879-3487
DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.053