Accuracy of a rapid glial fibrillary acidic protein/ubiquitin carboxyl‐terminal hydrolase L1 test for the prediction of intracranial injuries on head computed tomography after mild traumatic brain injury
Objective The objective was to determine the accuracy of a new, rapid blood test combining measurements of both glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxyl‐terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH‐L1) for predicting acute traumatic intracranial injury (TII) on head CT scan after mild traumatic b...
Saved in:
Published in: | Academic emergency medicine Vol. 28; no. 11; pp. 1308 - 1317 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01-11-2021
John Wiley and Sons Inc |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective
The objective was to determine the accuracy of a new, rapid blood test combining measurements of both glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxyl‐terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH‐L1) for predicting acute traumatic intracranial injury (TII) on head CT scan after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).
Methods
Analysis of banked venous plasma samples from subjects completing the Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Biomarkers of Traumatic Brain Injury (ALERT‐TBI) trial, enrolled 2012–2014 at 22 investigational sites in the United States and Europe. All subjects were ≥18 years old, presented to an emergency department (ED) with a nonpenetrating head injury and Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS) 9–15 (mild to moderate TBI), underwent head CT scanning as part of their clinical care, and had blood sampling within 12 h of injury. Plasma concentrations of GFAP and UCH‐L1 were measured using i‐STAT Alinity and TBI plasma cartridge and compared to acute TII on head CT scan.
Results
Of the 2011 subjects enrolled in ALERT‐TBI, 1918 had valid CT scans and plasma specimens for testing and 1901 (99.1%) had GCS 13–15 (mTBI), for which the rapid test was intended. Among these subjects, the rapid test had a sensitivity of 0.958 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.906 to 0.982), specificity of 0.404 (95% CI = 0.382 to 0.427), negative predictive value of 0.993 (95% CI = 0.985 to 0.997), and positive predictive value of 0.098 (95% CI = 0.082 to 0.116) for acute TII.
Conclusions
A rapid i‐STAT–based test had high sensitivity for prediction of acute TII, comparable to lab‐based platforms. The speed, portability, and high accuracy of this test may facilitate clinical adoption of brain biomarker testing as an aid to head CT decision making in EDs. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding information ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: This study did not primarily enroll patients and was not a registered clinical trial. The original ALERT‐TBI trail identifier is NCT01426919. This work was supported by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command's U.S. Army Medical Materiel Development Activity, contract no. W81XWH‐17‐C‐0079. The views, opinions and/or findings contained in this report are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy, or decision unless so designated by other documentation. In the conduct of research where humans are the subjects, the investigator(s) adhered to the policies regarding the protection of human subjects as prescribed by Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 45, Volume 1, Part 46; Title 32, Chapter 1, Part 219; and Title 21, Chapter 1, Part 50 (Protection of Human Subjects). Supervising Editor: Michael S. Runyon, MD, MPH. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1069-6563 1553-2712 |
DOI: | 10.1111/acem.14366 |