Is Lack of Placement of Drains After Thyroidectomy With Central Neck Dissection Safe? A Prospective, Randomized Study

Objective: Selective use of drains after thyroidectomy has been suggested in the literature. Although the safety of thyroidectomy without drains has been reviewed, there is little specific data available to identify the safety of thyroidectomy combined with central neck dissection (CND) without drai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Laryngoscope Vol. 116; no. 9; pp. 1632 - 1635
Main Authors: Lee, Seung Won, Choi, Eun Chang, Lee, Yong Man, Lee, Jae Yong, Kim, Shi Chan, Koh, Yoon Woo
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hoboken, NJ John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01-09-2006
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: Selective use of drains after thyroidectomy has been suggested in the literature. Although the safety of thyroidectomy without drains has been reviewed, there is little specific data available to identify the safety of thyroidectomy combined with central neck dissection (CND) without drains. This study aims to determine the feasibility and safety of thyroidectomy without drains, especially in cases of combined CND. Study Design: Prospective, randomized study. Materials and Methods: One hundred ninety‐eight consecutive thyroidectomized patients were enrolled in this study. Drain group (n = 101) consisted of 41 hemithyroidectomies (HT), 28 total thyroidectomies (TT), and 32 total TT with CND. No‐drain group (n = 97) consisted of 42 HT, 18 TT, and 37 TT with CND. The following variables were examined: perioperative complications (hemorrhage, hematoma, seroma), intraoperative bleeding, operation time, volume of resected thyroid gland, time of hospital discharge after operation, duration of drain placement, and total amount of drainage (drain group). Results: There were no significant differences in age, sex, volume of resected thyroid gland, types of operation, operation time, and histopathlologic diagnosis between two groups. In the drain group, overall perioperative complications occurred in seven (7/101, 6.9%) patients. In the no‐drain group, overall perioperative complications occurred in nine (10/97, 10.3%) patients. There was no significant difference in overall perioperative complications between the drain and no‐drain groups, even in cases of performing CND. Time of hospital discharge after operation was significantly shorter in the no‐drain group than the drain group (P < .05). Conclusions: We conclude that thyroidectomy without drains is safe and effective even in combination with CND and appears to confer several advantages over the routine drainage method. In addition, we achieved significant reduction of hospital stay, which led to a reduction in costs for the patients.
Bibliography:istex:D054B4C964CD9932BE55218573505685A5106E8D
ark:/67375/WNG-6112B79X-V
ArticleID:LARY5541160921
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
DOI:10.1097/01.mlg.0000231314.86486.be