LionVu 2.0 Usability Assessment for Pennsylvania, United States

The Penn State Cancer Initiative implemented LionVu 1.0 (Penn State University, United States) in 2017 as a web-based mapping tool to educate and inform public health professionals about the cancer burden in Pennsylvania and 28 counties in central Pennsylvania, locally known as the catchment area. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:ISPRS international journal of geo-information Vol. 9; no. 11; p. 619
Main Authors: Geyer, Nathaniel R, Kessler, Fritz C, Lengerich, Eugene J
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 01-11-2020
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The Penn State Cancer Initiative implemented LionVu 1.0 (Penn State University, United States) in 2017 as a web-based mapping tool to educate and inform public health professionals about the cancer burden in Pennsylvania and 28 counties in central Pennsylvania, locally known as the catchment area. The purpose of its improvement, LionVu 2.0, was to assist investigators answer person-place-time questions related to cancer and its risk factors by examining several data variables simultaneously. The primary objective of this study was to conduct a usability assessment of a prototype of LionVu 2.0 which included area- and point-based data. The assessment was conducted through an online survey; 10 individuals, most of whom had a masters or doctorate degree, completed the survey. Although most participants had a favorable view of LionVu 2.0, many had little to no experience with web mapping. Therefore, it was not surprising to learn that participants wanted short 10-15-minute training videos to be available with future releases, and a simplified user-interface that removes advanced functionality. One unexpected finding was the suggestion of using LionVu 2.0 for teaching and grant proposals. The usability study of the prototype of LionVu 2.0 provided important feedback for its future development.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Eugene J. Lengerich and Nathaniel R. Geyer; methodology, Nathaniel R. Geyer; software, Nathaniel R. Geyer; formal analysis, Nathaniel R. Geyer; resources, Eugene J. Lengerich; data curation, Nathaniel R. Geyer; writing—original draft preparation, Nathaniel R. Geyer; writing—review and editing, Fritz C. Kessler; visualization, Nathaniel R. Geyer; supervision, Fritz C. Kessler; project administration, Eugene J. Lengerich; funding acquisition, Eugene J. Lengerich. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
ISSN:2220-9964
2220-9964
DOI:10.3390/ijgi9110619