A biomechanical comparison of four reconstruction techniques for the medial collateral ligament-deficient elbow

The initial strength of the intact medial collateral ligament (MCL) of the elbow and the strength of 4 reconstruction techniques were compared. Twenty cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in a custom jig with the elbow at 90°, and a pneumatic cyclic valgus loading protocol was used. The mean pea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery Vol. 14; no. 2; pp. 207 - 215
Main Authors: Armstrong, April D., Dunning, Cynthia E., Ferreira, Louis M., Faber, Kenneth J., Johnson, James A., King, Graham J.W.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York, NY Mosby, Inc 01-03-2005
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The initial strength of the intact medial collateral ligament (MCL) of the elbow and the strength of 4 reconstruction techniques were compared. Twenty cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in a custom jig with the elbow at 90°, and a pneumatic cyclic valgus loading protocol was used. The mean peak load to failure was 142.5 ± 39.4 N for the intact ligaments and 53.0 ± 9.5 N for the docking reconstructions, 52.5 ± 10.4 N for the EndoButton reconstructions, 41.0 ± 16.0 N for the interference screw reconstructions, and 33.3 ± 7.1 N for the figure-eight reconstructions. The peak load to failure of the MCL reconstructions was inferior compared with the intact ligament (P < .001). No difference in strength was found between the docking and single-strand medial collateral reconstruction with the use of an EndoButton for ulnar fixation (P > .05, β = .14). Both of these reconstruction methods were stronger than the interference screw or figure-eight technique (P < .004). The optimal fixation method for a single-strand MCL reconstruction may require improved interference screws or a modified EndoButton procedure.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1058-2746
1532-6500
DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2004.06.006