A biomechanical comparison of four reconstruction techniques for the medial collateral ligament-deficient elbow
The initial strength of the intact medial collateral ligament (MCL) of the elbow and the strength of 4 reconstruction techniques were compared. Twenty cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in a custom jig with the elbow at 90°, and a pneumatic cyclic valgus loading protocol was used. The mean pea...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery Vol. 14; no. 2; pp. 207 - 215 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
New York, NY
Mosby, Inc
01-03-2005
Elsevier |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The initial strength of the intact medial collateral ligament (MCL) of the elbow and the strength of 4 reconstruction techniques were compared. Twenty cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in a custom jig with the elbow at 90°, and a pneumatic cyclic valgus loading protocol was used. The mean peak load to failure was 142.5 ± 39.4 N for the intact ligaments and 53.0 ± 9.5 N for the docking reconstructions, 52.5 ± 10.4 N for the EndoButton reconstructions, 41.0 ± 16.0 N for the interference screw reconstructions, and 33.3 ± 7.1 N for the figure-eight reconstructions. The peak load to failure of the MCL reconstructions was inferior compared with the intact ligament (P < .001). No difference in strength was found between the docking and single-strand medial collateral reconstruction with the use of an EndoButton for ulnar fixation (P > .05, β = .14). Both of these reconstruction methods were stronger than the interference screw or figure-eight technique (P < .004). The optimal fixation method for a single-strand MCL reconstruction may require improved interference screws or a modified EndoButton procedure. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-News-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1058-2746 1532-6500 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jse.2004.06.006 |