Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Dosing of Udenafil in the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: Results of a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Abstract Background A once-daily dosing regimen with a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor is needed for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), in part because of the behavioral complexities associated with sexual intimacy. Many patients prefer spontaneous rather than scheduled sexual activities...
Saved in:
Published in: | European urology Vol. 60; no. 2; pp. 380 - 387 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Kidlington
Elsevier B.V
01-08-2011
Elsevier |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract Background A once-daily dosing regimen with a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor is needed for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), in part because of the behavioral complexities associated with sexual intimacy. Many patients prefer spontaneous rather than scheduled sexual activities or they anticipate frequent sexual encounters. The pharmacokinetic profiles of udenafil with a time of maximal concentration of 1.0–1.5 h and a terminal half-life of 11–13 h make udenafil a good candidate for once-daily dosing. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily dosing of udenafil in the treatment of ED. Design, setting, and participants This multicenter randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, fix-dosed clinical trial involved 237 patients with ED. The subjects, who were treated with placebo or udenafil (25 mg, 50 mg, or 75 mg) once daily for 12 wk, were asked to complete the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary, and the Global Assessment Questionnaire (GAQ) during the study. Measurements The primary outcome parameter was the change from baseline for the IIEF erectile function domain (EFD) score. The secondary outcome parameters were SEP questions 2 and 3, the shift to normal rate (EFD ≥26), and the response to the GAQ. Results and limitations Compared with placebo, patients who took 50 mg or 75 mg of udenafil had a significantly improved IIEF-EFD score. Similar results were observed in comparing questions 2 and 3 in the SEP diary and the GAQ. Flushing was the most common treatment-related adverse event, which was transient and mild to moderate in severity. Conclusions Udenafil significantly improved erectile function among ED patients when administered in doses of 50 mg or 75 mg once daily for 12 wk. Daily administration of udenafil (50 mg) may be another treatment option for ED. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-News-2 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0302-2838 1873-7560 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.025 |