Difference in the thickness of mouthguards fabricated from ethylene-vinyl acetate co-polymer sheets with differently arranged v-shaped grooves

To investigate the form of mouthguard sheets that best retains its thickness. Mouthguards were molded using ethylene-vinyl-acetate (EVA) sheets and a suction-type molding device. Five sheet conditions were compared. These were I-N (Incisal part of the cast positioned at the center - Normal sheet), I...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of prosthodontic research Vol. 57; no. 3; p. 169
Main Authors: Takahashi, Mutsumi, Koide, Kaoru, Mizuhashi, Fumi
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Netherlands 01-07-2013
Subjects:
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To investigate the form of mouthguard sheets that best retains its thickness. Mouthguards were molded using ethylene-vinyl-acetate (EVA) sheets and a suction-type molding device. Five sheet conditions were compared. These were I-N (Incisal part of the cast positioned at the center - Normal sheet), I-H (Incisal part positioned at the center - Horizontal v-shaped groove 30 mm from the anterior end), I-C (Incisal part positioned at the center - Convexing v-shaped groove toward the back 10-40 mm from the anterior end), C-N (Center part positioned at the center - Normal sheet), and C-C (Center part positioned at the center - Convexing v-shaped groove toward the back 10-30 mm from the anterior end). Post-molding thickness was determined for the incisal (incisal edge and labial surface) and molar portion (cusp, central groove, and buccal surface). Sheets were heated until they sagged 15-mm below the clamp. Scheffé multivariate comparison was performed to compare changes in post-molding thickness among sheet conditions. Post-molding thickness of mouthguard material differed significantly between the two portions; rates of thickness reduction were smaller for I-C and C-C compared with other conditions. There were no significant differences between I-C and C-C at any measurement points. The present results suggested that thickness reduction of the EVA sheet material after vacuum-forming may be decreased at both incisal and molar portions if the v-shaped groove with a v-shaped cross section was given in the frontal teeth region of the sheet at the apparatus and materials for this study used.
ISSN:2212-4632
DOI:10.1016/j.jpor.2013.01.004