The limits of analogy: comparing Islamophobia and antisemitism

• Published in: Patterns of prejudice Vol. 48; no. 5; pp. 442 - 459
• Main Author: Klug, Brian
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Routledge 20-10-2014
• Subjects: analogy; Anti-Semitism; antisemitism; Conceptualization; Examinations; Islam; Islamophobia; Jews; limits; Muslims; new antisemitism; new Jews; Political Factors; Theoretical Problems; United Kingdom; Values
• ISSN: 0031-322X; 1461-7331
• DOI: 10.1080/0031322X.2014.964498

The predicament faced by Muslims today, either in the United Kingdom specifically or in the West more generally, is often compared with the predicament faced by Jews at some point in the past. Muslims, it is suggested, are the new Jews. Klug's article homes in on one element in this view, the claim that Islamophobia is the new antisemitism, and considers the analogy between them. An introductory section sketches the political context, after which Klug focuses on logical or conceptual issues. The two middle sections contain the core of the analysis: consideration of the two terms 'antisemitism' and 'Islamophobia' in relation to the concepts they denote, followed by an examination of the concepts as such. Certain conclusions are drawn about both their general logic and their specific logics. The final section returns to the political context and, via critique of a thesis put forward by Matti Bunzl, discusses the uses of the analogy. Klug argues that the question we need to ask is not 'Are Islamophobia and antisemitism analogous?' but 'What is the analogy worth?' The value of the analogy lies in the light it sheds on the social and political realities that confront us in the here and now. Does it illuminate more than it obscures? These things are a matter of judgement. Klug leans towards asserting an analogy between antisemitism in the past and Islamophobia in the present, within limits.