The Utility of Symptoms in Identification of Primary Angle-Closure in a High-Risk Population

Objective To examine the frequency of symptoms associated with primary angle closure in an East Asian population with high rates of disease. Design Population-based survey. Participants One thousand adults from rural and urban provinces of Mongolia were examined. Methods A standard questionnaire was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Vol. 115; no. 11; pp. 2024 - 2029
Main Authors: Ong, Ee Lin, Baasanhu, Jamyanjav, MD, PhD, DCEH, Nolan, Winifred, MD, FRCOphth, Uranchimeg, Davatsuren, MSc, MD, Lee, Pak–Sang, MSc, MPhil, Alsbirk, Poul Helge, MD, DrMed, Johnson, Gordon J., MD, FRCSC, Foster, Paul J., PhD, FRCSEd
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01-11-2008
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective To examine the frequency of symptoms associated with primary angle closure in an East Asian population with high rates of disease. Design Population-based survey. Participants One thousand adults from rural and urban provinces of Mongolia were examined. Methods A standard questionnaire was used to determine a history of symptoms of angle closure. All participants underwent applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, and slit-lamp examination by the same observer. The frequency of symptoms was compared between normal subjects and those in 3 high-risk or affected groups: gonioscopically confirmed occludable angles, peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) detected on gonioscopy, and anterior chamber depth of less than 2.5 mm. Main Outcome Measures The frequency of symptoms associated with primary angle closure. Results Symptoms of visual disturbance and ocular pain traditionally linked with angle closure were reported frequently by both normal and potentially affected people. Intermittent blurring of vision at night was the only common symptom of angle closure that was significantly more frequent in people with narrow angles and PAS ( P = 0.004, 48.4% vs. 31.0% narrow angles; P = 0.001, 54.3% vs. 30.6% PAS), but not in those with shallow anterior chambers ( P = 0.670, 38.3% vs. 30.9%). Conclusions Direct questioning about symptoms associated with angle closure identified high rates of positive responses in both affected and unaffected groups. Although the rate of symptoms tended to be higher in affected people, none of these symptoms were specific enough to be considered useful as a diagnostic criterion. Financial Disclosure(s) The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0161-6420
1549-4713
DOI:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.06.023