Identifying Consciousness in Other Creatures: Three Initial Steps

• Published in: Behavioral sciences Vol. 14; no. 4; p. 337
• Main Authors: Heredia Cedillo, Alejandro, Lambert, Dennis, Morsella, Ezequiel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 01-04-2024
• Subjects: Anencephaly; Brain research; Consciousness; encapsulation; evolution; Hallucinations; Hypotheses; Neurophysiology; passive frame theory; unconscious processing; New York; encapsulation; evolution; unconscious processing; consciousness; passive frame theory
• ISSN: 2076-328X; 2076-328X
• DOI: 10.3390/bs14040337

Identifying consciousness in other creatures, be they animals or exotic creatures that have yet to be discovered, remains a great scientific challenge. We delineate the first three steps that we think are necessary for identifying consciousness in other creatures. Step 1 is to define the particular kind of consciousness in which one is interested. Step 2 is to identify, in humans, the key differences between the brain processes that are associated with consciousness and the brain processes that are not associated with consciousness. For Step 2, to identify these differences, we focus on passive frame theory. Step 3 concerns how the insights derived from consciousness research on humans (e.g., concerning these differences) can be generalized to other creatures. We discuss the significance of examining how consciousness was fashioned by the process of evolution, a process that could be happenstance and replete with incessant tinkering, yielding adaptations that can be suboptimal and counterintuitive, far different in nature from our efficiently designed robotic systems. We conclude that the more that is understood about the differences between conscious processing and unconscious processing in humans, the easier it will be to identify consciousness in other creatures.