Reconstructing orogens without biostratigraphy The Saharides and continental growth during the final assembly of Gondwana-Land
A hitherto unknown Neoproterozoic orogenic system, the Saharides, is described in North Africa. It formed during the 900–500-Ma interval. The Saharides involved large subduction accretion complexes occupying almost the entire Arabian Shield and much of Egypt and parts of the small Precambrian inlier...
Saved in:
Published in: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 117; no. 51; pp. 32278 - 32284 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
22-12-2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | A hitherto unknown Neoproterozoic orogenic system, the Saharides, is described in North Africa. It formed during the 900–500-Ma interval. The Saharides involved large subduction accretion complexes occupying almost the entire Arabian Shield and much of Egypt and parts of the small Precambrian inliers in the Sahara including the Ahaggar mountains. These complexes consist of, at least by half, juvenile material forming some 5 million km² new continental crust. Contrary to conventional wisdom in the areas they occupy, evolution of the Saharides involved no continental collisions until the end of their development. They formed by subduction and strike-slip stacking of arc material mostly by precollisional coastwise transport of arc fragments rifted from the Congo/Tanzania cratonic nucleus in a manner very similar to the development of the Nipponides in east Asia, parts of the North American Cordillera and the Altaids. The Sahara appears to be underlain by a double orocline similar to the Hercynian double orocline in western Europe and northwestern Africa and not by an hypothetical “Saharan Metacraton.” The method we develop here may be useful to reconstruct the structure of some of the Precambrian orogenic belts before biostratigraphy became possible. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Reviewers: J.K., Georg-August-Universität Göttingen; and L.H.R., Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Author contributions: A.M.C.Ş. designed research; A.M.C.Ş., N.L., C.Z., and G.S. performed research; A.M.C.Ş., N.L., C.Z., G.S., and T.Ö. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; A.M.C.Ş., N.L., C.Z., and G.S. analyzed data; A.M.C.Ş. wrote the paper; and N.L., C.Z., and G.S. provided critical feedback and helped shape the research and manuscript. Contributed by A. M. Celâl Şengör, October 3, 2020 (sent for review July 17, 2020; reviewed by Jonas Kley and Leigh H. Royden) |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.2015117117 |