Systematic reanalysis of genomic data improves quality of variant interpretation

As genomic sequencing expands, so does our knowledge of the link between genetic variation and disease. Deeper catalogs of variant frequencies improve identification of benign variants, while sequencing affected individuals reveals disease‐associated variation. Accumulation of human genetic data thu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical genetics Vol. 94; no. 1; pp. 174 - 178
Main Authors: Hiatt, S.M., Amaral, M.D., Bowling, K.M., Finnila, C.R., Thompson, M.L., Gray, D.E., Lawlor, J.M.J., Cochran, J.N., Bebin, E.M., Brothers, K.B., East, K.M., Kelley, W.V., Lamb, N.E., Levy, S.E., Lose, E.J., Neu, M.B., Rich, C.A., Simmons, S., Myers, R.M., Barsh, G.S., Cooper, G.M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-07-2018
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:As genomic sequencing expands, so does our knowledge of the link between genetic variation and disease. Deeper catalogs of variant frequencies improve identification of benign variants, while sequencing affected individuals reveals disease‐associated variation. Accumulation of human genetic data thus makes reanalysis a means to maximize the benefits of clinical sequencing. We implemented pipelines to systematically reassess sequencing data from 494 individuals with developmental disability. Reanalysis yielded pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants that were not initially reported in 23 individuals, 6 described here, comprising a 16% increase in P/LP yield. We also downgraded 3 LP and 6 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) due to updated population frequency data. The likelihood of identifying a new P/LP variant increased over time, as ~22% of individuals who did not receive a P/LP variant at their original analysis subsequently did after 3 years. We show here that reanalysis and data sharing increase the diagnostic yield and accuracy of clinical sequencing.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
equal contributions
ISSN:0009-9163
1399-0004
DOI:10.1111/cge.13259