Perioperative haemostasis with full‐length, PEGylated, recombinant factor VIII with extended half‐life (rurioctocog alfa pegol) in patients with haemophilia A: Final results of a multicentre, single‐arm phase III trial

Introduction Rurioctocog alfa pegol (BAX 855, TAK‐660) is a PEGylated, full‐length, recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) with extended half‐life developed from unmodified rFVIII (antihaemophilic factor [recombinant]). Aim To determine the perioperative haemostatic efficacy and safety of rurioctocog alfa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia Vol. 25; no. 5; pp. 773 - 781
Main Authors: Gruppo, Ralph, López‐Fernández, Maria‐Fernanda, Wynn, Tung T., Engl, Werner, Sharkhawy, Marlies, Tangada, Srilatha
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-09-2019
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction Rurioctocog alfa pegol (BAX 855, TAK‐660) is a PEGylated, full‐length, recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) with extended half‐life developed from unmodified rFVIII (antihaemophilic factor [recombinant]). Aim To determine the perioperative haemostatic efficacy and safety of rurioctocog alfa pegol in male previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe haemophilia A. Methods This multicentre, single‐arm, phase III study included PTPs who were to undergo major or minor elective or minor emergency surgical, dental or other invasive procedures. Rurioctocog alfa pegol dose and frequency were individualized based on patients’ pharmacokinetic profiles for major surgeries and by rurioctocog alfa pegol incremental recovery for minor surgeries. Haemostatic efficacy was assessed using the Global Haemostatic Efficacy Assessment score. Results Twenty‐one patients aged 16‐61 years underwent 21 major and five minor surgeries. For all 24 evaluable surgeries, overall haemostatic efficacy was rated as excellent and blood loss comparable to that expected in non‐haemophilic patients. No blood transfusions were required intraoperatively but were administered postoperatively for four surgeries in three patients. Five injury‐related postoperative bleeding episodes occurred in five patients, of which two required additional rurioctocog alfa pegol treatment. Two non‐serious adverse events of mild severity (increased ALT level and headache) were considered possibly related to rurioctocog alfa pegol. There were no deaths or treatment‐related serious adverse events. No patients developed inhibitory antibodies to FVIII or persistent IgG‐ or IgM‐binding antibodies to FVIII, PEG‐FVIII or PEG. Conclusion Rurioctocog alfa pegol was well tolerated and effective for perioperative use in patients with haemophilia A and showed no signs of immunogenicity.
Bibliography:Funding information
This study was funded by Baxalta US Inc., a Takeda company, Lexington, MA, USA.
Data Availability Statement
and should be directed to
The datasets, including redacted study protocol, redacted statistical analysis plan and individual participants data behind the results reported in this article, will be available 3 months after the submission of a request to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal after de‐identification, in compliance with applicable privacy laws, data protection and requirements for consent and anonymization. Data requests should follow the process outlined in the Data Sharing section on Shire's website
clinicaltrialdata@shire.com
.
http://www.shiretrials.com/en/our-commitment-to-transparency/data-sharing-with-researchers
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
The full results of this study have been presented, in part, as an abstract and poster (#LB 09) at the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 8‐13 July 2017, Berlin, Germany.
Data Availability Statement: The datasets, including redacted study protocol, redacted statistical analysis plan and individual participants data behind the results reported in this article, will be available 3 months after the submission of a request to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal after de‐identification, in compliance with applicable privacy laws, data protection and requirements for consent and anonymization. Data requests should follow the process outlined in the Data Sharing section on Shire's website: http://www.shiretrials.com/en/our-commitment-to-transparency/data-sharing-with-researchers and should be directed to http://clinicaltrialdata@shire.com.
ISSN:1351-8216
1365-2516
DOI:10.1111/hae.13807