Bricks, trusses and superstructures: Strategies for skeletal reinforcement in batoid fishes (rays and skates)

Crushing and eating hard prey (durophagy) is mechanically demanding. The cartilage jaws of durophagous stingrays are known to be reinforced relative to non-durophagous relatives, with a thickened external cortex of mineralized blocks (tesserae), reinforcing struts inside the jaw (trabeculae), and pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in cell and developmental biology Vol. 10; p. 932341
Main Authors: Clark, Brett, Chaumel, Júlia, Johanson, Zerina, Underwood, Charlie, Smith, Moya M., Dean, Mason N.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A 12-10-2022
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Crushing and eating hard prey (durophagy) is mechanically demanding. The cartilage jaws of durophagous stingrays are known to be reinforced relative to non-durophagous relatives, with a thickened external cortex of mineralized blocks (tesserae), reinforcing struts inside the jaw (trabeculae), and pavement-like dentition. These strategies for skeletal strengthening against durophagy, however, are largely understood only from myliobatiform stingrays, although a hard prey diet has evolved multiple times in batoid fishes (rays, skates, guitarfishes). We perform a quantitative analysis of micro-CT data, describing jaw strengthening mechanisms in Rhina ancylostoma (Bowmouth Guitarfish) and Rhynchobatus australiae (White-spotted Wedgefish), durophagous members of the Rhinopristiformes, the sister taxon to Myliobatiformes. Both species possess trabeculae, more numerous and densely packed in Rhina , albeit simpler structurally than those in stingrays like Aetobatus and Rhinoptera . Rhina and Rhynchobatus exhibit impressively thickened jaw cortices, often involving >10 tesseral layers, most pronounced in regions where dentition is thickest, particularly in Rhynchobatus . Age series of both species illustrate that tesserae increase in size during growth, with enlarged and irregular tesserae associated with the jaws’ oral surface in larger (older) individuals of both species, perhaps a feature of ageing. Unlike the flattened teeth of durophagous myliobatiform stingrays, both rhinopristiform species have oddly undulating dentitions, comprised of pebble-like teeth interlocked to form compound “meta-teeth” (large spheroidal structures involving multiple teeth). This is particularly striking in Rhina , where the upper/lower occlusal surfaces are mirrored undulations, fitting together like rounded woodworking finger-joints. Trabeculae were previously thought to have arisen twice independently in Batoidea; our results show they are more widespread among batoid groups than previously appreciated, albeit apparently absent in the phylogenetically basal Rajiformes. Comparisons with several other durophagous and non-durophagous species illustrate that batoid skeletal reinforcement architectures are modular: trabeculae can be variously oriented and are dominant in some species (e.g. Rhina , Aetobatus ), whereas cortical thickening is more significant in others (e.g. Rhynchobatus ), or both reinforcing features can be lacking (e.g. Raja , Urobatis ). We discuss interactions and implications of character states, framing a classification scheme for exploring cartilage structure evolution in the cartilaginous fishes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Tatjana Haitina, Uppsala University, Sweden
These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
This article was submitted to Evolutionary Developmental Biology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Edited by: Sylvain Marcellini, University of Concepcion, Chile
Jonathan Huie, George Washington University, United States
Jake Leyhr, Uppsala University, Sweden, in collaboration with reviewer TH
Matthew Vickaryous, University of Guelph, Canada
ISSN:2296-634X
2296-634X
DOI:10.3389/fcell.2022.932341