Hemoperfusion in patients with severe COVID-19 respiratory failure, lifesaving or not?

• Published in: Journal of research in medical sciences Vol. 26; no. 1; p. 34
• Main Authors: Abbasi, Saeed, Naderi, Zohre, Amra, Babak, Atapour, Abdolamir, Dadkhahi, Seyed Amir, Eslami, Mohammad Javad, Hajian, Mohammad Reza, Hashemi, Marzieh, Hashemi, Seyed Taghi, Iraj, Bijan, Khorvash, Farzin, Madadi, Samane, Pour, Hossein Mahjoubi, Mansourian, Marjan, Rezvani, Majid, Sami, Ramin, Soltaninejad, Forough, Shahidi, Shahrzad, Vahdat, Sahar, Zamani, Zahra, Moeinzadeh, Firouzeh
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: India Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 01-01-2021; Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
• Subjects: covid-19; hemoperfusion; Original; respiratory failure
• ISSN: 1735-1995; 1735-7136
• DOI: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_1122_20

Background: The new coronavirus outbreak quickly filled hospital beds and stunned the world. Intensive care is required for 5% of patients, and the mortality rate for critically ill patients is 49%. The “cytokine storm” is considered as the main cause of pathogenesis for coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19)-related respiratory failure, hemoperfusion may be a modality for treatment of disease. Materials and Methods: Thirty-seven an patients with positive real-time polymerase chain reaction for SARStions2 in an upper respiratory tract sample or typical chest computed tomography lesion were eligible for this case–control study. Patients meeting the criteria for hemoperfusion including clinical and laboratory indices, were evaluated for outcomes such as hospitalization length and mortality. Patients were divided into three groups, i.e., patients who received hemoperfusion without a need for mechanical ventilation (MV), patients who received hemoperfusion before MV, and patients who received hemoperfusion after MV. Results: Among 37 patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure, 32% were female with a mean age of 55.54 (standard deviation 14.1) years. There was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in terms of length of hospital stay and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (P-tayns: 0.593 and 0.243, respectively, confidence interval [CI]: 95%). Heart rate, respiratory rate, PaO 2 /FIO 2 , high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and ferritin significantly improved after the application of hemoperfusion in all groups ( P < 0.05, CI: 95%). Conclusion: It seems that applying hemoperfusion in the inflammatory phase of the disease, especially before the intubation, reduce the need for MV. However, hemoperfusion does not have any impacts on the duration of hospital and ICU stay.