Development of Preschoolers’ Understanding of Zero

• Published in: Frontiers in psychology Vol. 12; p. 583734
• Main Authors: Krajcsi, Attila, Kojouharova, Petia, Lengyel, Gábor
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Frontiers Media S.A 27-07-2021
• Subjects: cardinality principle; items based number representation; number status of zero; numerical cognition; Psychology; zero
• ISSN: 1664-1078; 1664-1078
• DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.583734

While knowledge on the development of understanding positive integers is rapidly growing, the development of understanding zero remains not well-understood. Here, we test several components of preschoolers’ understanding of zero: Whether they can use empty sets in numerical tasks (as measured with comparison, addition, and subtraction tasks); whether they can use empty sets soon after they understand the cardinality principle (cardinality-principle knowledge is measured with the give-N task); whether they know what the word “zero” refers to (tested in all tasks in this study); and whether they categorize zero as a number (as measured with the smallest-number and is-it-a-number tasks). The results show that preschoolers can handle empty sets in numerical tasks as soon as they can handle positive numbers and as soon as, or even earlier than, they understand the cardinality principle. Some also know that these sets are labeled as “zero.” However, preschoolers are unsure whether zero is a number. These results identify three components of knowledge about zero: operational knowledge, linguistic knowledge, and meta-knowledge. To account for these results, we propose that preschoolers may understand numbers as the properties of items or objects in a set. In this view, zero is not regarded as a number because an empty set does not include any items, and missing items cannot have any properties, therefore, they cannot have the number property either. This model can explain why zero is handled correctly in numerical tasks even though it is not regarded as a number.