Does closure of fascia, type, and location of trocar influence occurrence of port site hernias? A literature review

• Published in: Surgical endoscopy Vol. 34; no. 12; pp. 5250 - 5258
• Main Authors: Gutierrez, Monica, Stuparich, Mallory, Behbehani, Sadikah, Nahas, Samar
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01-12-2020; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Abdominal Surgery; Fascia - pathology; Female; Gastroenterology; Gynecology; Hepatology; Hernia - complications; Hernias; Humans; Laparoscopy; Laparoscopy - methods; Literature reviews; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Needlestick injuries; Proctology; Review Article; Surgery; Surgical Instruments - standards; Trocar site hernia; Laparoscopic surgery; Complication laparoscopic surgery; Port site hernia
• ISSN: 0930-2794; 1432-2218
• DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07826-8

Background
Since the introduction of laparoscopic surgery, it has become more popular with many advantages over open surgery including faster recovery, shorter hospital stays, and decreased tissue trauma. Despite its benefits, laparoscopic surgery can result in its own unique complications, such as the formation of a trocar site hernia (TSH), which have been reported in approximately 0–1.0% of laparoscopic cases when using non-bladed trocars.
Methods
A literature review was performed from June 1990 to June 2019. PubMed was searched using the keywords “laparoscopic surgery,” “trocar site hernia,” and “port site hernia.” Only articles in English were identified but not limited to the USA.
Results
The total number of patients in all articles was 18,533 with a mean follow-up period of 22.50 ± 1.76 months. The overall trocar site hernia rate was 0.104%. When comparing open vs. closed ports, there was no significant difference in the hernia incidence rate for 5-mm and 10-mm ports. When comparing bladed versus non-bladed trocars left open, there was a statistically significant difference with lower hernia incidence rates for non-bladed trocars over bladed trocars for 5-mm, 10-mm, and 12-mm ports. And when comparing trocar location from midline versus off-midline, there was a statistically significant higher TSH incidence in midline trocar locations.
Conclusion
Results suggest that TSH rate is lower when using non-bladed trocars for any size of trocar. When comparing whether fascial closure had an effect, the 5-mm and 10-mm ports had no difference in incidence rates and leaving the fascia open can reduce operative time, risk of needlestick injuries, and overall procedural cost. In addition, trocars at midline locations resulted in higher TSH incidence rates. Future research is still needed to assess for other factors that may influence hernia formation and how it can be minimized.