Total and not bevacizumab-bound vascular endothelial growth factor as potential predictive factors to bevacizumab-based chemotherapy in colorectal cancer
AIM: To identify suitable biomarkers of response to bevacizumab(BV)- it remains an open question. The measurement of serum vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF) has been proposed as a predictive factor for this drug, even if literature data are contradictory. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated t...
Saved in:
Published in: | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG Vol. 22; no. 27; pp. 6287 - 6295 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
21-07-2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | AIM: To identify suitable biomarkers of response to bevacizumab(BV)- it remains an open question. The measurement of serum vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF) has been proposed as a predictive factor for this drug, even if literature data are contradictory. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the role of BV, total and not BV-bound VEGF and angiopoietin-2(Ang-2) serum levels as potential predictive factors of response for BV in combination with an oxaliplatinbased chemotherapy. BV, Ang-2, total and not BVbound VEGF levels were measured at baseline, before 2nd and 5th cycle of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in 20 consecutive metastatic colorectal cancer patients. RESULTS: Results were correlated to response to treatment. Variability in BV levels have been found, with decreased level in less responding patients. In particular, the concentration of BV increased of 3.96 ± 0.69 folds in serum of responsive patients after 3 more cycles of therapy compared to those with stable or progressive disease with a 0.72 ± 0.25 and 2.10 ± 0.13 fold increase, respectively. The determination of free and total VEGF demonstrated that the ratio between the two values, evaluated immediately before the 2nd and the 5th cycle of therapy, decreased from 26.65% ± 1.33% to 15.50% ± 3.47% in responsive patients and from 53.41% ± 4.75 to 34.95% ± 2.88% in those with stable disease. Conversely, in those with progression of disease, the ratio showed the opposite behavior coming up from 25.99% ± 5.23% to 51.71% ± 5.28%. The Ang-2 levels did not show any relationship. CONCLUSION: Our data show that the ratio of not BV-bound VEGF to total VEGF serum and BV plasma concentrations for predicting the response to BV plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy could be a promising biomarker of response to BV. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Amalia Azzariti;Letizia Porcelli;Oronzo Brunetti;Marzia Del Re;Vito Longo;Patrizia Nardulli;Michele Signorile;Jian-Ming Xu;Angela Calabrese;Anna Elisa Quatrale;Evaristo Maiello;Vito Lorusso;Nicola Silvestris;Clinical and Preclinical Pharmacology Laboratory, National Cancer Research Centre Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II;Medical Oncology Unit, National Cancer Research Centre Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II;Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine University Hospital;Medical Oncology Unit, "Mons R Dimiccoli" Hospital;Pharmacology Unit, National Cancer Research Centre Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II;Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Affiliated Hospital Cancer Center, Academy of Military Medical Sciences;Radiology unit, National Cancer Research Centre Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II;Medical Oncology Unit, "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza" Hospital ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Author contributions: Azzariti A, Porcelli L, Brunetti O, and Quatrale AE make substantial contributions to conception and design, and/or acquisition of data, and/or analysis and interpretation of data; Del Re M, Longo V, Nardulli P, Xu JM, Maiello E, Lorusso V and Silvestris N participate in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; Calabrese A performed radiological evaluation of response to treatment; and Brunetti O, Lorusso V and Silvestris N give final approval of the version to be submitted and any revised version; all the authors contributed to this manuscript. Correspondence to: Nicola Silvestris, MD, Medical Oncology Unit, National Cancer Research Centre Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Viale Orazio Flacco, 65, 70124 Bari, Italy. n.silvestris@oncologico.bari.it Telephone: +39-80-5555419 |
ISSN: | 1007-9327 2219-2840 |
DOI: | 10.3748/wjg.v22.i27.6287 |