Survival analysis model to estimate sensory shelf life with temperature and illumination as accelerating factors
•We developed a survival model which considered two accelerating factors: temperature and illumination.•The blocking effect of the consumer was considered in the survival model.•The model was applied to real data from a lemon-flavored drink sensory shelf-life.•As expected shelf life was shortened wi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Food quality and preference Vol. 68; pp. 371 - 376 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article Publication |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier Ltd
01-09-2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •We developed a survival model which considered two accelerating factors: temperature and illumination.•The blocking effect of the consumer was considered in the survival model.•The model was applied to real data from a lemon-flavored drink sensory shelf-life.•As expected shelf life was shortened with an increase in temperature and under illumination.
The main objective of this study was to introduce a survival model to contemplate two simultaneous accelerating factors affecting a food product’s shelf life: temperature and illumination. A second objective was to consider the case where the same consumer tests different experimental conditions and thus his/her data are not independent. Sample data comprised 108 consumers who evaluated a lemon-flavored juice stored at 24 °C, 37 °C and 45 °C; under conditions of no-illumination and with illumination; with seven different storage times for each of the six experimental conditions. Aiming to estimate the storage time at which a consumer rejects a sample a model including an Arrhenius term for the temperature, a binomial response for illumination (with and without) and the interaction of both was developed. The model also considered that the same consumer tested different experimental conditions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0950-3293 1873-6343 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.03.014 |