Nummular Headache: A Prospective Series of 14 New Cases
Objective.—To study the clinical features of nummular headache (NH) and get an approach to its epidemiology. Background.—NH has been recently described as a primary disorder characterized by head pain exclusively felt in a small rounded area typically 2‐6 cm in diameter. Methods.—Through a 1‐year pe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Headache Vol. 44; no. 6; pp. 611 - 614 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148 , USA
Blackwell Publishing, Inc
01-06-2004
Blackwell |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective.—To study the clinical features of nummular headache (NH) and get an approach to its epidemiology.
Background.—NH has been recently described as a primary disorder characterized by head pain exclusively felt in a small rounded area typically 2‐6 cm in diameter.
Methods.—Through a 1‐year period we have studied all patients referred to our neurologic clinic because of head pain exclusively felt in a small‐circumscribed area, and not attributed to another disorder. All the patients had normal neurological, analytical, and neuroimaging examinations. All the patients belonged within the same regional care system comprising 220,000 inhabitants.
Results.—A total of 11 females and 3 males were studied. Based in our hospital series, the incidence was 6.4/100,000/year. The mean age at the onset was 38 years (range: 13‐72). Only three patients had another concurrent headache: migraine (n = 2), and trigeminal neuralgia (n = 1) which proved to have an independent course. All the patients reported head pain exclusively felt in either a rounded (n = 12) of 1‐6 cm diameter, or an oval area (n = 2) of 5 × 3 cm, and 2 × 3 cm, respectively. Both size and shape of the painful area remained constant since the onset of symptoms. The location of the symptomatic area was mostly parietal (n = 7) or temporal (n = 5), but also frontal (n = 1) and in occiput (n = 1). The background pain was mostly mild‐to‐moderate, but also moderate‐to‐severe pain was reported. Exacerbations—either spontaneous or precipitated by combing hair or touching the symptomatic area—were reported by 8 patients. The temporal pattern was chronic‐continuous (n = 7) and episodic (n = 7). Ten patients reported a variable combination of sensory disturbance (tenderness, hypoesthesia, hyperalgesia, and allodynia) in the symptomatic area. There were no autonomic accompaniments. Treatment was generally not necessary. When needed, standard oral doses of paracetamol usually sufficed.
Conclusions.—NH emerges as a clear‐cut clinical picture. It is a noninfrequent primary headache. The particular topography suggests the pain has a probable epicranial source conveyed by, or originated in, one/a few terminal branch(es) of the cutaneous nerves of the scalp. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:004C4BFABD933C9503B2C6615B451FA67C12ECE2 ArticleID:HEAD446011 ark:/67375/WNG-WP8VVLK0-4 From the Department of Neurology, Fundación Hospital Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain; the Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Santa Bárbara, Puertollano, Ciudad Real, Spain. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0017-8748 1526-4610 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2004.446011.x |