United States family planning providers' knowledge of and attitudes towards preexposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention: a national survey

• Published in: Contraception (Stoneham) Vol. 93; no. 5; pp. 463 - 469
• Main Authors: Seidman, Dominika, Carlson, Kimberly, Weber, Shannon, Witt, Jacki, Kelly, Patricia J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-05-2016
• Subjects: Adult; Family planning; Family Planning Services; Female; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Health Personnel - education; HIV Infections - prevention & control; HIV prevention; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Obstetrics and Gynecology; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - statistics & numerical data; Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis - methods; Preexposure prophylaxis; PrEP; Surveys and Questionnaires; United States; Women; Women's Health; Young Adult; Women; Family planning; HIV prevention; PrEP; Preexposure prophylaxis
• ISSN: 0010-7824; 1879-0518
• DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.12.018

Abstract Objectives The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention defines HIV prevention as a core family planning service. The HIV community identified family planning visits as key encounters for women to access preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention. No studies explore US family planning providers' knowledge of and attitudes towards PrEP. We conducted a national survey of clinicians to understand barriers and facilitators to PrEP implementation in family planning. Study design Family planning providers recruited via website postings, national meetings, and email completed an anonymous survey in 2015. Descriptive statistics were performed. Results Among 604 respondents, 495 were eligible for analysis and 342 were potential PrEP prescribers (physicians, nurse practitioners, midwives or physicians assistants). Among potential prescribers, 38% correctly defined PrEP [95% confidence interval (CI): 32.5–42.8], 37% correctly stated the efficacy of PrEP (95% CI: 32.0–42.4), and 36% chose the correct HIV test after a recent exposure (95% CI: 30.6–40.8). Characteristics of those who answered knowledge questions correctly included age less than 35 years, practicing in the Northeast or West, routinely offering HIV testing, providing rectal sexually transmitted infection screening or having seen any PrEP guidelines. Even among providers in the Northeast and West, the proportion of respondents answering questions correctly was less than 50%. Thirty-six percent of respondents had seen any PrEP guidelines. Providers identified lack of training as the main barrier to PrEP implementation; 87% wanted PrEP education. Conclusions To offer comprehensive HIV prevention services, family planning providers urgently need training on PrEP and HIV testing. Implications US family planning providers have limited knowledge about HIV PrEP and HIV testing, and report lack of provider training as the main barrier to PrEP provision. Provider education is needed to ensure that family planning clients access comprehensive HIV prevention methods.