A novel approach to determining augmented bone volume in intraoral bone block augmentation using an intraoral scanner: an in vitro study

• Published in: International journal of implant dentistry Vol. 9; no. 1; p. 26
• Main Authors: Frederic, Weichel, Lukas, Kalchthaler, Reinald, Kühle, Christopher, Büsch, Oliver, Ristow, Michael, Engel, Christian, Freudlsperger, Jürgen, Hoffmann, Christian, Mertens
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 05-09-2023; Springer Nature B.V; SpringerOpen
• Subjects: Algorithms; Annotations; Autogenous bone; Automated volume measurement; Automation; Bone augmentation; Bone blocks, intraoral bone graft; Bone regeneration; Correlation coefficients; Dentistry; Dimensional analysis; Hypotheses; Measurement techniques; Medicine; Open source software; Public domain; Registration; Reliability; Scanners; Skin & tissue grafts; Technical Advances; Technical Advances Article; Titanium; Transplants & implants; Volume measurement; Volumetric analysis; Workflow; Autogenous bone; Bone blocks, intraoral bone graft; Bone augmentation; Bone regeneration; Automated volume measurement
• ISSN: 2198-4034; 2198-4034
• DOI: 10.1186/s40729-023-00492-0

Introduction
Bone augmentation procedures are established tools for reshaping the alveolar ridge and increasing bone volume. Different approaches are being used to measure postoperative bone volume gain. This study aimed to develop an objective and automated volume measurement tool equally as precise as manual slice-by-slice annotation.
Materials and methods
To evaluate the proposed workflow, we performed an in vitro study with 20 pig mandibles that were grafted using three different grafting techniques—autogenous full block, split block bone and shell augmentation. The pig jaws were scanned pre- and postoperatively using an intraoral scanner. The resulting surface files (baseline, full block, split block, shell) were processed using the new volume-measuring workflow as well as using manual slice-by-slice annotation at baseline (
t
0) and at 6 months (
t
1) using the same population. Two TOSTs (Test of One-Sided Significance) and NHSTs (Null Hypothesis Significance Test) were used to compare the two workflows. The intra-rater reliability between
t
0 and
t
1 was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients.
Results
The mean difference for the full block augmentation technique was − 0.015 cm
3
(
p
 < 0.001); for the split block technique, it was − 0.034 cm
3
p
 = 0.01, and for the shell technique, it was − 0.042 cm
3
. All results were statistically not different from zero and statistically equivalent to zero. The results also showed an excellent absolute intra-rater agreement.
Conclusions
The semiautomatic volume measurement established in this article achieves comparable results to manual slice-by-slice measuring in determining volumes on STL files generated by intraoral scanners and shows an excellent intra-rater reliability.
Graphical Abstract