A randomized controlled trial of a pediatric asthma outreach program
Background: Previous studies have shown that asthma education and case management may reduce asthma emergency care, hospitalizations, and expenditures. Objective: We sought to study the effect of an asthma outreach program (AOP), a team-based, case-management intervention, on emergency ward (EW) and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of allergy and clinical immunology Vol. 103; no. 3; pp. 436 - 440 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
New York, NY
Mosby, Inc
01-03-1999
Elsevier |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background: Previous studies have shown that asthma education and case management may reduce asthma emergency care, hospitalizations, and expenditures.
Objective: We sought to study the effect of an asthma outreach program (AOP), a team-based, case-management intervention, on emergency ward (EW) and hospital use.
Methods: Fifty-seven patients aged 1 to 15 years with the diagnosis of asthma based on the usual clinical practice criteria who were continuously enrolled in a staff-model health maintenance organization for a period of at least 2 consecutive years were randomized into 2 intervention groups. The control group received a single intensive asthma education intervention, and the AOP group received the same initial education but then was followed-up by an asthma case management nurse throughout the intervention period.
Results: EW visits, hospitalizations, and total outside-of-health-plan expenditures (consisting of EW and hospital expenses, as well as miscellaneous costs, such as ambulance, durable medical equipment, tertiary referrals, and home care) were assessed from claims filed for a year before and after enrollment. Control group patients experienced significant reductions in EW visits (39%), hospitalizations (43%), and outside-of-health-plan costs (28%), possibly as a result of the baseline educational intervention received by all enrolled patients, in conjunction with regression to the mean. AOP group patients experienced significant reductions in EW visits, (73%,
P = .0002), hospitalizations (84%,
P = .0012), and outside-of-health-plan use (82%,
P < .0001). When compared with the control group, AOP group patients demonstrated additional significant reductions in EW visits (57%,
P < .05), hospitalizations (75%,
P < .05), and outside-of-health-plan use (71%,
P < .001). Estimates of direct savings to the health plan ranged from $7.69 to $11.67 for every dollar spent on the AOP nurse’s salary, depending on assumptions.
Conclusions: Asthma patients in a staff-model health maintenance organization decreased their resource use between 57% to 75% by participation in an AOP as compared with a randomized control group receiving only an educational intervention. Substantial savings were achieved compared with the cost of the AOP nurse. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;103:436-40.) |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-News-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0091-6749 1097-6825 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0091-6749(99)70468-9 |