A randomized controlled trial of a pediatric asthma outreach program

Background: Previous studies have shown that asthma education and case management may reduce asthma emergency care, hospitalizations, and expenditures. Objective: We sought to study the effect of an asthma outreach program (AOP), a team-based, case-management intervention, on emergency ward (EW) and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of allergy and clinical immunology Vol. 103; no. 3; pp. 436 - 440
Main Authors: Greineder, Dirk K., Loane, Kathleen C., Parks, Paula
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York, NY Mosby, Inc 01-03-1999
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Previous studies have shown that asthma education and case management may reduce asthma emergency care, hospitalizations, and expenditures. Objective: We sought to study the effect of an asthma outreach program (AOP), a team-based, case-management intervention, on emergency ward (EW) and hospital use. Methods: Fifty-seven patients aged 1 to 15 years with the diagnosis of asthma based on the usual clinical practice criteria who were continuously enrolled in a staff-model health maintenance organization for a period of at least 2 consecutive years were randomized into 2 intervention groups. The control group received a single intensive asthma education intervention, and the AOP group received the same initial education but then was followed-up by an asthma case management nurse throughout the intervention period. Results: EW visits, hospitalizations, and total outside-of-health-plan expenditures (consisting of EW and hospital expenses, as well as miscellaneous costs, such as ambulance, durable medical equipment, tertiary referrals, and home care) were assessed from claims filed for a year before and after enrollment. Control group patients experienced significant reductions in EW visits (39%), hospitalizations (43%), and outside-of-health-plan costs (28%), possibly as a result of the baseline educational intervention received by all enrolled patients, in conjunction with regression to the mean. AOP group patients experienced significant reductions in EW visits, (73%, P = .0002), hospitalizations (84%, P = .0012), and outside-of-health-plan use (82%, P < .0001). When compared with the control group, AOP group patients demonstrated additional significant reductions in EW visits (57%, P < .05), hospitalizations (75%, P < .05), and outside-of-health-plan use (71%, P < .001). Estimates of direct savings to the health plan ranged from $7.69 to $11.67 for every dollar spent on the AOP nurse’s salary, depending on assumptions. Conclusions: Asthma patients in a staff-model health maintenance organization decreased their resource use between 57% to 75% by participation in an AOP as compared with a randomized control group receiving only an educational intervention. Substantial savings were achieved compared with the cost of the AOP nurse. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;103:436-40.)
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0091-6749
1097-6825
DOI:10.1016/S0091-6749(99)70468-9