An investigation of 2 techniques for optimizing joint surface congruency using multiple cylindrical osteochondral autografts

Purpose: To compare 2 techniques for optimizing joint congruency for miniature osteochondral autografting in the knee: intrinsic postoperative forces acting on overdrilled autografts protruding from the femur versus alignment by a surgeon at the time of grafting. Type of Study: Controlled animal mod...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arthroscopy Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 50 - 55
Main Authors: Pearce, Simon G., Hurtig, Mark B., Clarnette, Richard, Kalra, Manpreet, Cowan, Bryce, Miniaci, Anthony
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Philadelphia, PA Elsevier Inc 01-01-2001
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose: To compare 2 techniques for optimizing joint congruency for miniature osteochondral autografting in the knee: intrinsic postoperative forces acting on overdrilled autografts protruding from the femur versus alignment by a surgeon at the time of grafting. Type of Study: Controlled animal model experiment. Methods: A full-thickness cartilage defect was created on the weight-bearing surface of the medial femoral condyle of 13 mature sheep. Three 4.5 × 10 mm cylindrical autografts were inserted into 14-mm deep recipient holes such that the grafts were held in place by side-wall friction alone. One treatment group received grafts that were delivered flush with the surrounding cartilage and the second group received grafts that were left 2-mm proud of the joint surface. Results: Three months postoperatively, the proud grafts had been repositioned by weight bearing but perigraft fissuring and fibroplasia, and subchondral cavitations were serious complications. It is suspected that these complications were caused by excessive motion between the graft and recipient site in the proud grafts. Conclusions: Grafts should be delivered flush with the joint surface when performing osteochondral transfers to avoid graft micromotion and the consequent interference with graft integration and function. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol 17, No 1 (January), 2001: pp 50–55
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0749-8063
1526-3231
DOI:10.1053/jars.2001.19966