Do community- and individual-level social relationships contribute to the mental health of disaster survivors?: A multilevel prospective study after the Great East Japan Earthquake

Disasters greatly threaten the health and lives of people all over the world. Japan experienced severe damage following the Great East Japan Earthquake on March 11, 2011, and some survivors continue to live in prefabricated temporary housing, built collectively in damaged areas. Previous studies hav...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social science & medicine (1982) Vol. 151; pp. 187 - 195
Main Authors: Matsuyama, Yusuke, Aida, Jun, Hase, Akihiro, Sato, Yukihiro, Koyama, Shihoko, Tsuboya, Toru, Osaka, Ken
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01-02-2016
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Disasters greatly threaten the health and lives of people all over the world. Japan experienced severe damage following the Great East Japan Earthquake on March 11, 2011, and some survivors continue to live in prefabricated temporary housing, built collectively in damaged areas. Previous studies have shown that social relationships in such communities have the potential to protect the mental health of disaster survivors. We examined the association between survivors' social support and social participation in 2012 and their psychological distress in 2013 using the K6 scale. Self-reported questionnaires were distributed to all 15,979 households in prefabricated temporary housing in eight municipalities in Miyagi prefecture in 2012, and 19,284 adults from 9366 (58.6%) households responded. One year later, 10,880 adults responded to a follow-up survey. Multivariate multilevel linear regression analyses with multiply imputed datasets showed that survivors' psychological distress at follow-up significantly differed between communities (community-level variance [standard error] = 0.38 [0.13]). The variance was reduced to 0.25 [0.09] after considering individual demographic characteristics and psychological distress at baseline. Individual- and community-level social relationships of 7.1% and 15.8%, respectively, explained the difference. After adjusting for covariates including K6 scale at baseline, individual-level social support, community-level social support, and individual-level social participation were significantly associated with low psychological distress at follow-up (coefficients [95% confidence intervals] were: −0.54 [−0.79, −0.30]; −0.43 [−0.72, −0.14]; and −0.22 [−0.40, −0.04], respectively). Community-level social participation was not significantly associated with psychological distress. The present study showed that: 1) survivors' psychological distress varied between temporary housing communities in 2013; 2) individual- and community-level social relationships contributed to the difference; and 3) individual- and community-level social relationships in 2012 were protectively associated with survivors' psychological distress in 2013. Promoting social relationships in communities after disasters might decrease disaster survivors' psychological distress. •Large-scale prospective study was conducted after the Great East Japan Earthquake.•Mental health of survivors living in temporary housing was followed over one year.•Survivors' mental health significantly differed among temporary housing communities.•Community-level social support also varied and contributed to the difference.•Community- and individual-level social relationships protect survivors' mental health.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0277-9536
1873-5347
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.008