Autophagy Inhibition by Targeting PIKfyve Potentiates Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Prostate Cancer
Multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (MTKIs) have thus far had limited success in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Here, we report a phase I-cleared orally bioavailable MTKI, ESK981, with a novel autophagy inhibitory property that decreased tumor growth in diverse preclinica...
Saved in:
Published in: | Nature cancer Vol. 2; no. 9; pp. 978 - 993 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
England
Nature Research
01-09-2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (MTKIs) have thus far had limited success in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Here, we report a phase I-cleared orally bioavailable MTKI, ESK981, with a novel autophagy inhibitory property that decreased tumor growth in diverse preclinical models of CRPC. The anti-tumor activity of ESK981 was maximized in immunocompetent tumor environments where it upregulated
expression through the interferon gamma pathway and promoted functional T cell infiltration, which resulted in enhanced therapeutic response to immune checkpoint blockade. Mechanistically, we identify the lipid kinase PIKfyve as the direct target of ESK981. PIKfyve-knockdown recapitulated ESK981's anti-tumor activity and enhanced the therapeutic benefit of immune checkpoint blockade. Our study reveals that targeting PIKfyve via ESK981 turns tumors from cold into hot through inhibition of autophagy, which may prime the tumor immune microenvironment in advanced prostate cancer patients and be an effective treatment strategy alone or in combination with immunotherapies. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS Y.Q. and A.M.C. participated in the planning, initiation, and overall analysis of data as well as writing, reviewing, and editing of the manuscript. Y.Q., S.A.S., A.D.D., N.B.H., P.D., and S.M. performed in vitro and in vivo experiments. J.C.T., J.E.C., K.J., and A.X. participated in in vivo experiments. Y.Q., T.R., and T.S. participated in lipidomics experimental design and data analysis. Z.W. and K.D. participated in the execution of chemical synthesis of ESK981. L.W., X.-M.W., and J.S. performed histological sample preparation, staining, and interpretation of RNA-ISH results. L.X. helped with CRISPR Atg5 knockout design. X.W. assisted with ELISA experiments. X.C., F.S., R.W., and J.N.V. performed RNA-seq library preparation, sequencing, and data analysis. J.Y., I. K., and J.E.C. participated in flow cytometry analysis. A.B. and D.J.K. participated in yeast experiments and data interpretation. E.L.E. performed electron microscopy analysis, and E.L.E. and D.J.K. participated in autophagy data interpretation. N.M.N. provided patient-derived xenograft models. S.J.E. participated in writing and preparation of this manuscript. W.Z. participated in immune checkpoint blockade experimental design and data interpretation. E.F.S., E.I.H., and A.M.C. provided project oversight for clinical trial design and review based on the interpretation of this preclinical data. |
ISSN: | 2662-1347 2662-1347 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s43018-021-00237-1 |